mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Experimental demonstration of magnetic tunnel junction-based computational random-access memory

arXiv 2312.14264 ↗First posted 21 Dec 2023cs.ET cond-mat.mes-hall cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conventional computing paradigm struggles to fulfill the rapidly growing demands from emerging applications, especially those for machine intelligence, because much of the power and energy is consumed by constant data transfers between logic and memory modules. A new paradigm, called "computational random-access memory (CRAM)" has emerged to address this fundamental limitation. CRAM performs logic operations directly using the memory cells themselves, without having the data ever leave the memory. The energy and performance benefits of CRAM for both conventional and emerging applications have been well established by prior numerical studies. However, there lacks an experimental demonstration and study of CRAM to evaluate its computation accuracy, which is a realistic and application-critical metrics for its technological feasibility and competitiveness. In this work, a CRAM array based on magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) is experimentally demonstrated. First, basic memory operations as well as 2-, 3-, and 5-input logic operations are studied. Then, a 1-bit full adder with two different designs is demonstrated. Based on the experimental results, a suite of modeling has been developed to characterize the accuracy of CRAM computation. Scalar addition, multiplication, and matrix multiplication, which are essential building blocks for many conventional and machine intelligence applications, are evaluated and show promising accuracy performance. With the confirmation of MTJ-based CRAM's accuracy, there is a strong case that this technology will have a significant impact on power- and energy-demanding applications of machine intelligence.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 101 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2023.

Builds on

10 of 101 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
  6. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  7. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  8. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
  9. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
  10. 2017In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unitcited by 610

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.