Foreseeing Reconstruction Quality of Gradient Inversion: An Optimization Perspective
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gradient inversion attacks can leak data privacy when clients share weight updates with the server in federated learning (FL). Existing studies mainly use L2 or cosine distance as the loss function for gradient matching in the attack. Our empirical investigation shows that the vulnerability ranking varies with the loss function used. Gradient norm, which is commonly used as a vulnerability proxy for gradient inversion attack, cannot explain this as it remains constant regardless of the loss function for gradient matching. In this paper, we propose a loss-aware vulnerability proxy (LAVP) for the first time. LAVP refers to either the maximum or minimum eigenvalue of the Hessian with respect to gradient matching loss at ground truth. This suggestion is based on our theoretical findings regarding the local optimization of the gradient inversion in proximity to the ground truth, which corresponds to the worst case attack scenario. We demonstrate the effectiveness of LAVP on various architectures and datasets, showing its consistent superiority over the gradient norm in capturing sample vulnerabilities. The performance of each proxy is measured in terms of Spearman's rank correlation with respect to several similarity scores. This work will contribute to enhancing FL security against any potential loss functions beyond L2 or cosine distance in the future.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2023.
Builds on
16 of 26 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
- 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 367
- 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 320
- 2021Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learningcited by 196
- 2021Gradient Inversion with Generative Image Priorcited by 101
- 2020R-GAP: Recursive Gradient Attack on Privacycited by 95
- 2021Label Leakage and Protection in Two-party Split Learningcited by 87
4 more
- 2022Do Gradient Inversion Attacks Make Federated Learning Unsafe?cited by 44
- 2023Surrogate Model Extension (SME): A Fast and Accurate Weight Update Attack on Federated Learningcited by 10
- 2022Label-only Model Inversion Attack: The Attack that Requires the Least Informationcited by 4
- 2021Quantifying and Localizing Usable Information Leakage from Neural Network Gradientscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.