mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Inferring the relationship between soil temperature and the normalized difference vegetation index with machine learning

arXiv 2312.12258 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Changes in climate can greatly affect the phenology of plants, which can have important feedback effects, such as altering the carbon cycle. These phenological feedback effects are often induced by a shift in the start or end dates of the growing season of plants. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) serves as a straightforward indicator for assessing the presence of green vegetation and can also provide an estimation of the plants' growing season. In this study, we investigated the effect of soil temperature on the timing of the start of the season (SOS), timing of the peak of the season (POS), and the maximum annual NDVI value (PEAK) in subarctic grassland ecosystems between 2014 and 2019. We also explored the impact of other meteorological variables, including air temperature, precipitation, and irradiance, on the inter-annual variation in vegetation phenology. Using machine learning (ML) techniques and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values, we analyzed the relative importance and contribution of each variable to the phenological predictions. Our results reveal a significant relationship between soil temperature and SOS and POS, indicating that higher soil temperatures lead to an earlier start and peak of the growing season. However, the Peak NDVI values showed just a slight increase with higher soil temperatures. The analysis of other meteorological variables demonstrated their impacts on the inter-annual variation of the vegetation phenology. Ultimately, this study contributes to our knowledge of the relationships between soil temperature, meteorological variables, and vegetation phenology, providing valuable insights for predicting vegetation phenology characteristics and managing subarctic grasslands in the face of climate change. Additionally, this work provides a solid foundation for future ML-based vegetation phenology studies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2023.

Builds on

9 of 95 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  5. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  6. 2019Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learningcited by 265
  7. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 208
  8. 2019Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilitycited by 114
  9. 2020General Pitfalls of Model-Agnostic Interpretation Methods for Machine Learning Modelscited by 75

Built on by

Not cited yet.