Colored Noise in PPO: Improved Exploration and Performance through Correlated Action Sampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), a popular on-policy deep reinforcement learning method, employs a stochastic policy for exploration. In this paper, we propose a colored noise-based stochastic policy variant of PPO. Previous research highlighted the importance of temporal correlation in action noise for effective exploration in off-policy reinforcement learning. Building on this, we investigate whether correlated noise can also enhance exploration in on-policy methods like PPO. We discovered that correlated noise for action selection improves learning performance and outperforms the currently popular uncorrelated white noise approach in on-policy methods. Unlike off-policy learning, where pink noise was found to be highly effective, we found that a colored noise, intermediate between white and pink, performed best for on-policy learning in PPO. We examined the impact of varying the amount of data collected for each update by modifying the number of parallel simulation environments for data collection and observed that with a larger number of parallel environments, more strongly correlated noise is beneficial. Due to the significant impact and ease of implementation, we recommend switching to correlated noise as the default noise source in PPO.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2023.
Builds on
14 of 26 references.
References · 14
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,179
- 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
- 2018Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisationcited by 318
- 2017Parameter Space Noise for Explorationcited by 158
- 2022Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 158
- 2021A Survey of Exploration Methods in Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
- 2020Smooth Exploration for Robotic Reinforcement Learningcited by 45
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.
8 papers.
- 2025Quantifying First-Order Markov Violations in Noisy Reinforcement Learning: A Causal Discovery Approachcited by 1
- 2026Dual-Flow Reinforcement Learning with State-Aware Explorationcited by 1
- 2026StructRL: Structured Action-Space Exploration for Flow-Based VLAscited by 1
- 2025CAIMAN: Causal Action Influence Detection for Sample-efficient Loco-manipulationcited by 0
- 2026Prediction-Based Markov Violation Scores for Detecting Non-Markovian Observations in Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Not All Transitions Matter: Evidence from PPOcited by 0
- 2026Infant Spontaneous Movement Noise Improves Exploration in Deep RLcited by 0
- 2026DexPolicy: Scheduled Exploration for Trajectory-Guided Dexterous Manipulationcited by 0
- 2026DexPolicy: Scheduled Exploration for Trajectory-Guided Dexterous Manipulation30 Sep 2026
- 2026StructRL: Structured Action-Space Exploration for Flow-Based VLAs15 Aug 2026
- 2026Dual-Flow Reinforcement Learning with State-Aware Exploration29 Jun 2026
- 2026Infant Spontaneous Movement Noise Improves Exploration in Deep RL15 Jun 2026
- 2026Not All Transitions Matter: Evidence from PPO22 May 2026
- 2026Prediction-Based Markov Violation Scores for Detecting Non-Markovian Observations in Reinforcement Learning28 Mar 2026
- 2025Quantifying First-Order Markov Violations in Noisy Reinforcement Learning: A Causal Discovery Approach28 Feb 2025
- 2025CAIMAN: Causal Action Influence Detection for Sample-efficient Loco-manipulation2 Feb 2025