Entity or Relation Embeddings? An Analysis of Encoding Strategies for Relation Extraction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Relation extraction is essentially a text classification problem, which can be tackled by fine-tuning a pre-trained language model (LM). However, a key challenge arises from the fact that relation extraction cannot straightforwardly be reduced to sequence or token classification. Existing approaches therefore solve the problem in an indirect way: they fine-tune an LM to learn embeddings of the head and tail entities, and then predict the relationship from these entity embeddings. Our hypothesis in this paper is that relation extraction models can be improved by capturing relationships in a more direct way. In particular, we experiment with appending a prompt with a [MASK] token, whose contextualised representation is treated as a relation embedding. While, on its own, this strategy significantly underperforms the aforementioned approach, we find that the resulting relation embeddings are highly complementary to what is captured by embeddings of the head and tail entity. By jointly considering both types of representations, we end up with a simple model that outperforms the state-of-the-art across several relation extraction benchmarks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2023.
Builds on
26 of 48 references.
References · 26
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
- 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 832
- 2020LUKE: Deep Contextualized Entity Representations with Entity-aware Self-attentioncited by 326
- 2020K-Adapter: Infusing Knowledge into Pre-Trained Models with Adapterscited by 318
- 2019Matching the Blanks: Distributional Similarity for Relation Learningcited by 271
- 2021KnowPrompt: Knowledge-aware Prompt-tuning with Synergistic Optimization for Relation Extractioncited by 180
- 2020TACRED Revisited: A Thorough Evaluation of the TACRED Relation Extraction Taskcited by 96
14 more
- 2021An Improved Baseline for Sentence-level Relation Extractioncited by 80
- 2020Learning from Context or Names? An Empirical Study on Neural Relation Extractioncited by 75
- 2021Re-TACRED: Addressing Shortcomings of the TACRED Datasetcited by 73
- 2021Label Verbalization and Entailment for Effective Zero- and Few-Shot Relation Extractioncited by 73
- 2023When does In-context Learning Fall Short and Why? A Study on Specification-Heavy Taskscited by 37
- 2022Summarization as Indirect Supervision for Relation Extractioncited by 31
- 2022Should We Rely on Entity Mentions for Relation Extraction? Debiasing Relation Extraction with Counterfactual Analysiscited by 30
- 2023How to Unleash the Power of Large Language Models for Few-shot Relation Extraction?cited by 30
- 2020RECON: Relation Extraction using Knowledge Graph Context in a Graph Neural Networkcited by 28
- 2021MirrorWiC: On Eliciting Word-in-Context Representations from Pretrained Language Modelscited by 18
- 2021KGPool: Dynamic Knowledge Graph Context Selection for Relation Extractioncited by 12
- 2021Improving Sentence-Level Relation Extraction through Curriculum Learningcited by 8
- 2023Distilling Semantic Concept Embeddings from Contrastively Fine-Tuned Language Modelscited by 8
- 2023PromptORE -- A Novel Approach Towards Fully Unsupervised Relation Extractioncited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.