mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Do LLMs Work on Charts? Designing Few-Shot Prompts for Chart Question Answering and Summarization

arXiv 2312.10610 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2023cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A number of tasks have been proposed recently to facilitate easy access to charts such as chart QA and summarization. The dominant paradigm to solve these tasks has been to fine-tune a pretrained model on the task data. However, this approach is not only expensive but also not generalizable to unseen tasks. On the other hand, large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive generalization capabilities to unseen tasks with zero- or few-shot prompting. However, their application to chart-related tasks is not trivial as these tasks typically involve considering not only the underlying data but also the visual features in the chart image. We propose PromptChart, a multimodal few-shot prompting framework with LLMs for chart-related applications. By analyzing the tasks carefully, we have come up with a set of prompting guidelines for each task to elicit the best few-shot performance from LLMs. We further propose a strategy to inject visual information into the prompts. Our experiments on three different chart-related information consumption tasks show that with properly designed prompts LLMs can excel on the benchmarks, achieving state-of-the-art.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2023.

Builds on

27 of 51 references.

References · 27

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  5. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  6. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  7. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  8. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  9. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  10. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  11. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,479
  12. 2021Unifying Vision-and-Language Tasks via Text Generationcited by 412
15 more
  1. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 403
  2. 2022Pix2Struct: Screenshot Parsing as Pretraining for Visual Language Understandingcited by 366
  3. 2019PlotQA: Reasoning over Scientific Plotscited by 321
  4. 2022Black-Box Tuning for Language-Model-as-a-Servicecited by 256
  5. 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarizationcited by 236
  6. 2022Chart-to-Text: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Chart Summarizationcited by 169
  7. 2022DePlot: One-shot visual language reasoning by plot-to-table translationcited by 160
  8. 2023UniChart: A Universal Vision-language Pretrained Model for Chart Comprehension and Reasoningcited by 160
  9. 2020Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metricscited by 158
  10. 2022MatCha: Enhancing Visual Language Pretraining with Math Reasoning and Chart Derenderingcited by 133
  11. 2022OpenCQA: Open-ended Question Answering with Chartscited by 61
  12. 2018Sentence-Level Fluency Evaluation: References Help, But Can Be Spared!cited by 43
  13. 2019Data Extraction from Charts via Single Deep Neural Networkcited by 24
  14. 2023ChartReader: A Unified Framework for Chart Derendering and Comprehension without Heuristic Rulescited by 24
  15. 2018Chart-Text: A Fully Automated Chart Image Descriptorcited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 8; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

10 papers.