mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Physics-Informed Deep Learning of Rate-and-State Fault Friction

arXiv 2312.09403 ↗First posted 14 Dec 2023math-ph cs.LG math.MPcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Direct observations of earthquake nucleation and propagation are few and yet the next decade will likely see an unprecedented increase in indirect, surface observations that must be integrated into modeling efforts. Machine learning (ML) excels in the presence of large data and is an actively growing field in seismology. However, not all ML methods incorporate rigorous physics, and purely data-driven models can predict physically unrealistic outcomes due to observational bias or extrapolation. Our work focuses on the recently emergent Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN), which seamlessly integrates data while ensuring that model outcomes satisfy rigorous physical constraints. In this work we develop a multi-network PINN for both the forward problem as well as for direct inversion of nonlinear fault friction parameters, constrained by the physics of motion in the solid Earth, which have direct implications for assessing seismic hazard. We present the computational PINN framework for strike-slip faults in 1D and 2D subject to rate-and-state friction. Initial and boundary conditions define the data on which the PINN is trained. While the PINN is capable of approximating the solution to the governing equations to low-errors, our primary interest lies in the network's capacity to infer friction parameters during the training loop. We find that the network for the parameter inversion at the fault performs much better than the network for material displacements to which it is coupled. Additional training iterations and model tuning resolves this discrepancy, enabling a robust surrogate model for solving both forward and inverse problems relevant to seismic faulting.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2023.

Builds on

10 of 57 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
  2. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
  3. 2017The Deep Ritz method: A deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problemscited by 583
  4. 2020hp-VPINNs: Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Domain Decompositioncited by 236
  5. 2022A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networkscited by 236
  6. 2019Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks For Solving Partial Differential Equationscited by 148
  7. 2019Transfer learning enhanced physics informed neural network for phase-field modeling of fracturecited by 116
  8. 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating a class of inverse problems for PDEscited by 102
  9. 2021On the approximation of functions by tanh neural networkscited by 81
  10. 2023Achieving High Accuracy with PINNs via Energy Natural Gradientscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.