mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adaptive Feature Selection for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment by Mitigating Semantic Noise Sensitivity

arXiv 2312.06158 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2023cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The current state-of-the-art No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA) methods typically rely on feature extraction from upstream semantic backbone networks, assuming that all extracted features are relevant. However, we make a key observation that not all features are beneficial, and some may even be harmful, necessitating careful selection. Empirically, we find that many image pairs with small feature spatial distances can have vastly different quality scores, indicating that the extracted features may contain a significant amount of quality-irrelevant noise. To address this issue, we propose a Quality-Aware Feature Matching IQA Metric (QFM-IQM) that employs an adversarial perspective to remove harmful semantic noise features from the upstream task. Specifically, QFM-IQM enhances the semantic noise distinguish capabilities by matching image pairs with similar quality scores but varying semantic features as adversarial semantic noise and adaptively adjusting the upstream task's features by reducing sensitivity to adversarial noise perturbation. Furthermore, we utilize a distillation framework to expand the dataset and improve the model's generalization ability. Our approach achieves superior performance to the state-of-the-art NR-IQA methods on eight standard IQA datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2023.

Builds on

26 of 47 references.

References · 26

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  7. 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,058
  8. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 792
  9. 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 553
  10. 2022MANIQA: Multi-dimension Attention Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 514
  11. 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 417
  12. 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 387
14 more
  1. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 351
  2. 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 301
  3. 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Vision-Language Correspondence: A Multitask Learning Perspectivecited by 276
  4. 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 224
  5. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 221
  6. 2015Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Qualitycited by 208
  7. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 165
  8. 2020MetaIQA: Deep Meta-learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 144
  9. 2020Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 134
  10. 2023Re-IQA: Unsupervised Learning for Image Quality Assessment in the Wildcited by 97
  11. 2021Image Quality Assessment using Contrastive Learningcited by 95
  12. 2020Transformer for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 76
  13. 2020GIQA: Generated Image Quality Assessmentcited by 51
  14. 2023Data-Efficient Image Quality Assessment with Attention-Panel Decodercited by 49

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

8 papers.