Domain Adaptation of a State of the Art Text-to-SQL Model: Lessons Learned and Challenges Found
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There are many recent advanced developments for the Text-to-SQL task, where the Picard model is one of the the top performing models as measured by the Spider dataset competition. However, bringing Text-to-SQL systems to realistic use-cases through domain adaptation remains a tough challenge. We analyze how well the base T5 Language Model and Picard perform on query structures different from the Spider dataset, we fine-tuned the base model on the Spider data and on independent databases (DB). To avoid accessing the DB content online during inference, we also present an alternative way to disambiguate the values in an input question using a rule-based approach that relies on an intermediate representation of the semantic concepts of an input question. In our results we show in what cases T5 and Picard can deliver good performance, we share the lessons learned, and discuss current domain adaptation challenges.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2023.
Builds on
15 of 22 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,106
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,304
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,549
- 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,133
- 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 900
- 2021PICARD: Parsing Incrementally for Constrained Auto-Regressive Decoding from Language Modelscited by 408
- 2022UnifiedSKG: Unifying and Multi-Tasking Structured Knowledge Grounding with Text-to-Text Language Modelscited by 231
- 2019CoSQL: A Conversational Text-to-SQL Challenge Towards Cross-Domain Natural Language Interfaces to Databasescited by 182
- 2019SParC: Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing in Contextcited by 142
- 2020Bridging Textual and Tabular Data for Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsingcited by 133
- 2020Structure-Grounded Pretraining for Text-to-SQLcited by 126
- 2021Towards Robustness of Text-to-SQL Models against Synonym Substitutioncited by 110
3 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.