mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Guaranteed Trust Region Optimization via Two-Phase KL Penalization

arXiv 2312.05405 ↗First posted 8 Dec 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

On-policy reinforcement learning (RL) has become a popular framework for solving sequential decision problems due to its computational efficiency and theoretical simplicity. Some on-policy methods guarantee every policy update is constrained to a trust region relative to the prior policy to ensure training stability. These methods often require computationally intensive non-linear optimization or require a particular form of action distribution. In this work, we show that applying KL penalization alone is nearly sufficient to enforce such trust regions. Then, we show that introducing a "fixup" phase is sufficient to guarantee a trust region is enforced on every policy update while adding fewer than 5% additional gradient steps in practice. The resulting algorithm, which we call FixPO, is able to train a variety of policy architectures and action spaces, is easy to implement, and produces results competitive with other trust region methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2023.

Builds on

27 of 36 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  3. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  4. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  5. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,179
  6. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
  7. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  8. 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 654
  9. 2020AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasetscited by 647
  10. 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 320
  11. 2019Way Off-Policy Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning of Implicit Human Preferences in Dialogcited by 283
  12. 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 233
15 more
  1. 2021Maximum Entropy RL (Provably) Solves Some Robust RL Problemscited by 169
  2. 2020What Matters In On-Policy Reinforcement Learning? A Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 157
  3. 2021Tianshou: a Highly Modularized Deep Reinforcement Learning Librarycited by 139
  4. 2020Phasic Policy Gradientcited by 121
  5. 2018Variational Discriminator Bottleneck: Improving Imitation Learning, Inverse RL, and GANs by Constraining Information Flowcited by 103
  6. 2019V-MPO: On-Policy Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimization for Discrete and Continuous Controlcited by 85
  7. 2020Sample Factory: Egocentric 3D Control from Pixels at 100000 FPS with Asynchronous Reinforcement Learningcited by 84
  8. 2019Information asymmetry in KL-regularized RLcited by 53
  9. 2017Optimal Auctions through Deep Learning: Advances in Differentiable Economicscited by 38
  10. 2020Revisiting Design Choices in Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 38
  11. 2020Leverage the Average: an Analysis of KL Regularization in RLcited by 33
  12. 2021Batch size-invariance for policy optimizationcited by 33
  13. 2021Differentiable Trust Region Layers for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
  14. 2022KL-Entropy-Regularized RL with a Generative Model is Minimax Optimalcited by 13
  15. 2023Mediated Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.