Guaranteed Trust Region Optimization via Two-Phase KL Penalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
On-policy reinforcement learning (RL) has become a popular framework for solving sequential decision problems due to its computational efficiency and theoretical simplicity. Some on-policy methods guarantee every policy update is constrained to a trust region relative to the prior policy to ensure training stability. These methods often require computationally intensive non-linear optimization or require a particular form of action distribution. In this work, we show that applying KL penalization alone is nearly sufficient to enforce such trust regions. Then, we show that introducing a "fixup" phase is sufficient to guarantee a trust region is enforced on every policy update while adding fewer than 5% additional gradient steps in practice. The resulting algorithm, which we call FixPO, is able to train a variety of policy architectures and action spaces, is easy to implement, and produces results competitive with other trust region methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2023.
Builds on
27 of 36 references.
References · 27
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,179
- 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
- 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 654
- 2020AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasetscited by 647
- 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 320
- 2019Way Off-Policy Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning of Implicit Human Preferences in Dialogcited by 283
- 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 233
15 more
- 2021Maximum Entropy RL (Provably) Solves Some Robust RL Problemscited by 169
- 2020What Matters In On-Policy Reinforcement Learning? A Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 157
- 2021Tianshou: a Highly Modularized Deep Reinforcement Learning Librarycited by 139
- 2020Phasic Policy Gradientcited by 121
- 2018Variational Discriminator Bottleneck: Improving Imitation Learning, Inverse RL, and GANs by Constraining Information Flowcited by 103
- 2019V-MPO: On-Policy Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimization for Discrete and Continuous Controlcited by 85
- 2020Sample Factory: Egocentric 3D Control from Pixels at 100000 FPS with Asynchronous Reinforcement Learningcited by 84
- 2019Information asymmetry in KL-regularized RLcited by 53
- 2017Optimal Auctions through Deep Learning: Advances in Differentiable Economicscited by 38
- 2020Revisiting Design Choices in Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 38
- 2020Leverage the Average: an Analysis of KL Regularization in RLcited by 33
- 2021Batch size-invariance for policy optimizationcited by 33
- 2021Differentiable Trust Region Layers for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 24
- 2022KL-Entropy-Regularized RL with a Generative Model is Minimax Optimalcited by 13
- 2023Mediated Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Ratio-Variance Regularized Policy Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Ratio-Variance Regularized Policy Optimization26 May 2026