mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Caregiver Talk Shapes Toddler Vision: A Computational Study of Dyadic Play

arXiv 2312.04118 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2023cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Infants' ability to recognize and categorize objects develops gradually. The second year of life is marked by both the emergence of more semantic visual representations and a better understanding of word meaning. This suggests that language input may play an important role in shaping visual representations. However, even in suitable contexts for word learning like dyadic play sessions, caregivers utterances are sparse and ambiguous, often referring to objects that are different from the one to which the child attends. Here, we systematically investigate to what extent caregivers' utterances can nevertheless enhance visual representations. For this we propose a computational model of visual representation learning during dyadic play. We introduce a synthetic dataset of ego-centric images perceived by a toddler-agent that moves and rotates toy objects in different parts of its home environment while hearing caregivers' utterances, modeled as captions. We propose to model toddlers' learning as simultaneously aligning representations for 1) close-in-time images and 2) co-occurring images and utterances. We show that utterances with statistics matching those of real caregivers give rise to representations supporting improved category recognition. Our analysis reveals that a small decrease/increase in object-relevant naming frequencies can drastically impact the learned representations. This affects the attention on object names within an utterance, which is required for efficient visuo-linguistic alignment. Overall, our results support the hypothesis that caregivers' naming utterances can improve toddlers' visual representations.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2023.

Builds on

13 of 39 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  5. 2020VirTex: Learning Visual Representations from Textual Annotationscited by 339
  6. 2020ThreeDWorld: A Platform for Interactive Multi-Modal Physical Simulationcited by 250
  7. 2021A Large-Scale Study on Unsupervised Spatiotemporal Representation Learningcited by 214
  8. 2021Using Shape to Categorize: Low-Shot Learning with an Explicit Shape Biascited by 118
  9. 2018Jointly Discovering Visual Objects and Spoken Words from Raw Sensory Inputcited by 81
  10. 2020Self-supervised learning through the eyes of a childcited by 61
  11. 2023Towards Democratizing Joint-Embedding Self-Supervised Learningcited by 18
  12. 2022Time to augment self-supervised visual representation learningcited by 15
1 more
  1. 2020A Computational Model of Early Word Learning from the Infant's Point of Viewcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.