mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Making Translators Privacy-aware on the User's Side

arXiv 2312.04068 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2023cs.CR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose PRISM to enable users of machine translation systems to preserve the privacy of data on their own initiative. There is a growing demand to apply machine translation systems to data that require privacy protection. While several machine translation engines claim to prioritize privacy, the extent and specifics of such protection are largely ambiguous. First, there is often a lack of clarity on how and to what degree the data is protected. Even if service providers believe they have sufficient safeguards in place, sophisticated adversaries might still extract sensitive information. Second, vulnerabilities may exist outside of these protective measures, such as within communication channels, potentially leading to data leakage. As a result, users are hesitant to utilize machine translation engines for data demanding high levels of privacy protection, thereby missing out on their benefits. PRISM resolves this problem. Instead of relying on the translation service to keep data safe, PRISM provides the means to protect data on the user's side. This approach ensures that even machine translation engines with inadequate privacy measures can be used securely. For platforms already equipped with privacy safeguards, PRISM acts as an additional protection layer, reinforcing their security furthermore. PRISM adds these privacy features without significantly compromising translation accuracy. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of PRISM using real-world translators, T5 and ChatGPT (GPT-3.5-turbo), and the datasets with two languages. PRISM effectively balances privacy protection with translation accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2023.

Builds on

20 of 51 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  5. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  6. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
  7. 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,197
  8. 2017The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension Challengecited by 590
  9. 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 218
  10. 2017A Survey on Homomorphic Encryption Schemes: Theory and Implementationcited by 154
  11. 2019Privacy- and Utility-Preserving Textual Analysis via Calibrated Multivariate Perturbationscited by 115
  12. 2015The Goldilocks Principle: Reading Children's Books with Explicit Memory Representationscited by 108
8 more
  1. 2019Leveraging Hierarchical Representations for Preserving Privacy and Utility in Textcited by 49
  2. 2017A4NT: Author Attribute Anonymity by Adversarial Training of Neural Machine Translationcited by 41
  3. 2019ER-AE: Differentially Private Text Generation for Authorship Anonymizationcited by 35
  4. 2023Embarrassingly Simple Text Watermarkscited by 23
  5. 2021Private Recommender Systems: How Can Users Build Their Own Fair Recommender Systems without Log Data?cited by 7
  6. 2022Towards Principled User-side Recommender Systemscited by 7
  7. 2021Retrieving Black-box Optimal Images from External Databasescited by 6
  8. 2022CLEAR: A Fully User-side Image Search Systemcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.