GeoShapley: A Game Theory Approach to Measuring Spatial Effects in Machine Learning Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces GeoShapley, a game theory approach to measuring spatial effects in machine learning models. GeoShapley extends the Nobel Prize-winning Shapley value framework in game theory by conceptualizing location as a player in a model prediction game, which enables the quantification of the importance of location and the synergies between location and other features in a model. GeoShapley is a model-agnostic approach and can be applied to statistical or black-box machine learning models in various structures. The interpretation of GeoShapley is directly linked with spatially varying coefficient models for explaining spatial effects and additive models for explaining non-spatial effects. Using simulated data, GeoShapley values are validated against known data-generating processes and are used for cross-comparison of seven statistical and machine learning models. An empirical example of house price modeling is used to illustrate GeoShapley's utility and interpretation with real world data. The method is available as an open-source Python package named geoshapley.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2023.
Builds on
14 of 66 references.
References · 14
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
- 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 344
- 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 305
- 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 254
- 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 167
- 2020Improving KernelSHAP: Practical Shapley Value Estimation via Linear Regressioncited by 154
- 2021ETA Prediction with Graph Neural Networks in Google Mapscited by 130
- 2020Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex Modelscited by 107
- 2021A Review of Location Encoding for GeoAI: Methods and Applicationscited by 54
- 2019Machine Learning Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Instrumentscited by 29
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025Can Moran Eigenvectors Improve Machine Learning of Spatial Data? Insights from Synthetic Data Validationcited by 1
- 2025The Geography of Transportation Cybersecurity: Visitor Flows, Industry Clusters, and Spatial Dynamicscited by 0
- 2025Improving the Computational Efficiency and Explainability of GeoAggregatorcited by 0
- 2025SX-GeoTree: Self-eXplaining Geospatial Regression Tree Incorporating the Spatial Similarity of Feature Attributionscited by 0
- 2026Evaluating the Alignment Between GeoAI Explanations and Domain Knowledge in Satellite-Based Flood Mappingcited by 0
- 2026Evaluating the Alignment Between GeoAI Explanations and Domain Knowledge in Satellite-Based Flood Mapping28 Apr 2026
- 2025SX-GeoTree: Self-eXplaining Geospatial Regression Tree Incorporating the Spatial Similarity of Feature Attributions25 Nov 2025
- 2025Improving the Computational Efficiency and Explainability of GeoAggregator23 Jul 2025
- 2025The Geography of Transportation Cybersecurity: Visitor Flows, Industry Clusters, and Spatial Dynamics12 May 2025
- 2025Can Moran Eigenvectors Improve Machine Learning of Spatial Data? Insights from Synthetic Data Validation16 Apr 2025