mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MoSA: Mixture of Sparse Adapters for Visual Efficient Tuning

arXiv 2312.02923 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2023cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid growth in the scale of pre-trained foundation models, parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques have gained significant attention, among which Adapter Tuning is the most widely used. Despite achieving efficiency, it still underperforms full fine-tuning, and the performance improves at the cost of an increase in parameters. Recent efforts have either focused on training multiple adapter experts to increase model capacity or on pruning adapters to achieve parameter efficiency. However, both approaches introduce more parameters compared to the original adapter, hence are not computationally efficient. Motivated by this, we propose Mixture of Sparse Adapters, or MoSA, as a novel Adapter Tuning method to fully unleash the potential of each parameter in the adapter. We first split the standard adapter into multiple non-overlapping modules, then stochastically activate them for sparse training, and finally merge them to form a complete adapter after tuning. In this way, MoSA can achieve significantly better performance than standard adapters without any additional computational or storage overhead. Furthermore, we propose a hierarchical sparse strategy to better leverage limited training data. Extensive experiments on a series of 27 visual tasks demonstrate that MoSA consistently outperforms other Adapter Tuning methods as well as other baselines by a large margin. Furthermore, MoSA brings consistent improvements across various model scales, architectures, and different PEFT methods. Code will be released.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2023.

Builds on

60 of 87 references.

References · 60

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  6. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  7. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  8. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  9. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  10. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  11. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  12. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
38 more
  1. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  2. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  3. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  4. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  5. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  6. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  7. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  8. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  9. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  10. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
  11. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  12. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,492
  13. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  14. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,245
  15. 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 999
  16. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 919
  17. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 896
  18. 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 797
  19. 2020AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learningcited by 788
  20. 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 719
  21. 2021Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layerscited by 460
  22. 2020AdapterHub: A Framework for Adapting Transformerscited by 444
  23. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
  24. 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 422
  25. 2020Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning with Diff Pruningcited by 352
  26. 2016EIE: Efficient Inference Engine on Compressed Deep Neural Networkcited by 295
  27. 2022Scaling & Shifting Your Features: A New Baseline for Efficient Model Tuningcited by 294
  28. 2017Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networkscited by 265
  29. 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
  30. 2023Sequential Modeling Enables Scalable Learning for Large Vision Modelscited by 212
  31. 2022ST-Adapter: Parameter-Efficient Image-to-Video Transfer Learningcited by 193
  32. 2022Delta Tuning: A Comprehensive Study of Parameter Efficient Methods for Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 180
  33. 2021MoEfication: Transformer Feed-forward Layers are Mixtures of Expertscited by 152
  34. 2023Pushing Mixture of Experts to the Limit: Extremely Parameter Efficient MoE for Instruction Tuningcited by 150
  35. 2021Raise a Child in Large Language Model: Towards Effective and Generalizable Fine-tuningcited by 146
  36. 2021Composable Sparse Fine-Tuning for Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 144
  37. 2022AdaMix: Mixture-of-Adaptations for Parameter-efficient Model Tuningcited by 137
  38. 2022Neural Prompt Searchcited by 135

50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3.

6 papers.