mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning-Based Approaches to Predictive Monitoring with Conformal Statistical Guarantees

arXiv 2312.01959 ↗First posted 4 Dec 2023cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This tutorial focuses on efficient methods to predictive monitoring (PM), the problem of detecting at runtime future violations of a given requirement from the current state of a system. While performing model checking at runtime would offer a precise solution to the PM problem, it is generally computationally expensive. To address this scalability issue, several lightweight approaches based on machine learning have recently been proposed. These approaches work by learning an approximate yet efficient surrogate (deep learning) model of the expensive model checker. A key challenge remains to ensure reliable predictions, especially in safety-critical applications. We review our recent work on predictive monitoring, one of the first to propose learning-based approximations for CPS verification of temporal logic specifications and the first in this context to apply conformal prediction (CP) for rigorous uncertainty quantification. These CP-based uncertainty estimators offer statistical guarantees regarding the generalization error of the learning model, and they can be used to determine unreliable predictions that should be rejected. In this tutorial, we present a general and comprehensive framework summarizing our approach to the predictive monitoring of CPSs, examining in detail several variants determined by three main dimensions: system dynamics (deterministic, non-deterministic, stochastic), state observability, and semantics of requirements' satisfaction (Boolean or quantitative).

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2023.

Builds on

22 of 69 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 629
  2. 2019Conformal Prediction Under Covariate Shiftcited by 519
  3. 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
  4. 2022Adaptive Conformal Predictions for Time Seriescited by 161
  5. 2018Verisig: verifying safety properties of hybrid systems with neural network controllerscited by 84
  6. 2020Robust Validation: Confident Predictions Even When Distributions Shiftcited by 82
  7. 2020The Probabilistic Model Checker Stormcited by 66
  8. 2014Regression Conformal Prediction with Nearest Neighbourscited by 59
  9. 2015Robust Online Monitoring of Signal Temporal Logiccited by 39
  10. 2022Conformal Prediction for STL Runtime Verificationcited by 35
  11. 2019JuliaReach: a Toolbox for Set-Based Reachabilitycited by 28
  12. 2023Multi-Agent Reachability Calibration with Conformal Predictioncited by 25
10 more
  1. 2020RTAMT: Online Robustness Monitors from STLcited by 19
  2. 2014On-Line Monitoring for Temporal Logic Robustnesscited by 15
  3. 2022Conformal Quantitative Predictive Monitoring of STL Requirements for Stochastic Processescited by 13
  4. 2021Predictive Runtime Monitoring for Mobile Robots using Logic-Based Bayesian Intent Inferencecited by 8
  5. 2014Smoothed Model Checking for Uncertain Continuous Time Markov Chainscited by 7
  6. 2021Neural Predictive Monitoring under Partial Observabilitycited by 7
  7. 2018Neural State Classification for Hybrid Systemscited by 5
  8. 2022Sampling-Based Verification of CTMCs with Uncertain Ratescited by 5
  9. 2021Time-Robust Control for STL Specificationscited by 4
  10. 2022An STL-based Formulation of Resilience in Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.