mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Conformal Quantitative Predictive Monitoring of STL Requirements for Stochastic Processes

arXiv 2211.02375 ↗First posted 4 Nov 2022eess.SY cs.LG cs.LOcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of predictive monitoring (PM), i.e., predicting at runtime the satisfaction of a desired property from the current system's state. Due to its relevance for runtime safety assurance and online control, PM methods need to be efficient to enable timely interventions against predicted violations, while providing correctness guarantees. We introduce textitquantitative predictive monitoring (QPM), the first PM method to support stochastic processes and rich specifications given in Signal Temporal Logic (STL). Unlike most of the existing PM techniques that predict whether or not some property φ is satisfied, QPM provides a quantitative measure of satisfaction by predicting the quantitative (aka robust) STL semantics of φ. QPM derives prediction intervals that are highly efficient to compute and with probabilistic guarantees, in that the intervals cover with arbitrary probability the STL robustness values relative to the stochastic evolution of the system. To do so, we take a machine-learning approach and leverage recent advances in conformal inference for quantile regression, thereby avoiding expensive Monte-Carlo simulations at runtime to estimate the intervals. We also show how our monitors can be combined in a compositional manner to handle composite formulas, without retraining the predictors nor sacrificing the guarantees. We demonstrate the effectiveness and scalability of QPM over a benchmark of four discrete-time stochastic processes with varying degrees of complexity.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2022.

Builds on

13 of 42 references.

References · 13

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 620
  3. 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 417
  4. 2018Verisig: verifying safety properties of hybrid systems with neural network controllerscited by 83
  5. 2017How Should a Robot Assess Risk? Towards an Axiomatic Theory of Risk in Roboticscited by 57
  6. 2022Conformal Prediction for STL Runtime Verificationcited by 34
  7. 2019Neural Simplex Architecturecited by 27
  8. 2021Predictive Runtime Monitoring for Mobile Robots using Logic-Based Bayesian Intent Inferencecited by 8
  9. 2014Smoothed Model Checking for Uncertain Continuous Time Markov Chainscited by 7
  10. 2021Neural Predictive Monitoring under Partial Observabilitycited by 7
  11. 2018Neural State Classification for Hybrid Systemscited by 5
  12. 2021Time-Robust Control for STL Specificationscited by 4
1 more
  1. 2022Temporal Robustness of Stochastic Signalscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

12 papers.