mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Harnessing the Power of Prompt-based Techniques for Generating School-Level Questions using Large Language Models

arXiv 2312.01032 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Designing high-quality educational questions is a challenging and time-consuming task. In this work, we propose a novel approach that utilizes prompt-based techniques to generate descriptive and reasoning-based questions. However, current question-answering (QA) datasets are inadequate for conducting our experiments on prompt-based question generation (QG) in an educational setting. Therefore, we curate a new QG dataset called EduProbe for school-level subjects, by leveraging the rich content of NCERT textbooks. We carefully annotate this dataset as quadruples of 1) Context: a segment upon which the question is formed; 2) Long Prompt: a long textual cue for the question (i.e., a longer sequence of words or phrases, covering the main theme of the context); 3) Short Prompt: a short textual cue for the question (i.e., a condensed representation of the key information or focus of the context); 4) Question: a deep question that aligns with the context and is coherent with the prompts. We investigate several prompt-based QG methods by fine-tuning pre-trained transformer-based large language models (LLMs), namely PEGASUS, T5, MBART, and BART. Moreover, we explore the performance of two general-purpose pre-trained LLMs such as Text-Davinci-003 and GPT-3.5-Turbo without any further training. By performing automatic evaluation, we show that T5 (with long prompt) outperforms all other models, but still falls short of the human baseline. Under human evaluation criteria, TextDavinci-003 usually shows better results than other models under various prompt settings. Even in the case of human evaluation criteria, QG models mostly fall short of the human baseline. Our code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/my625/PromptQG

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2023.

Builds on

19 of 41 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  5. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  6. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  7. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  8. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  9. 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,100
  10. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
  11. 2019Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generationcited by 668
  12. 2018QuAC : Question Answering in Contextcited by 379
7 more
  1. 2019Leveraging Pre-trained Checkpoints for Sequence Generation Taskscited by 182
  2. 2020Re-evaluating Evaluation in Text Summarizationcited by 144
  3. 2020Semantic Graphs for Generating Deep Questionscited by 38
  4. 2021Controllable Open-ended Question Generation with A New Question Type Ontologycited by 36
  5. 2019Capturing Greater Context for Question Generationcited by 19
  6. 2019Question-type Driven Question Generationcited by 16
  7. 2020Exploring Question-Specific Rewards for Generating Deep Questionscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 8; 2025: 1.

9 papers.