Local monotone operator learning using non-monotone operators: MnM-MOL
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The recovery of magnetic resonance (MR) images from undersampled measurements is a key problem that has seen extensive research in recent years. Unrolled approaches, which rely on end-to-end training of convolutional neural network (CNN) blocks within iterative reconstruction algorithms, offer state-of-the-art performance. These algorithms require a large amount of memory during training, making them difficult to employ in high-dimensional applications. Deep equilibrium (DEQ) models and the recent monotone operator learning (MOL) approach were introduced to eliminate the need for unrolling, thus reducing the memory demand during training. Both approaches require a Lipschitz constraint on the network to ensure that the forward and backpropagation iterations converge. Unfortunately, the constraint often results in reduced performance compared to unrolled methods. The main focus of this work is to relax the constraint on the CNN block in two different ways. Inspired by convex-non-convex regularization strategies, we now impose the monotone constraint on the sum of the gradient of the data term and the CNN block, rather than constrain the CNN itself to be a monotone operator. This approach enables the CNN to learn possibly non-monotone score functions, which can translate to improved performance. In addition, we only restrict the operator to be monotone in a local neighborhood around the image manifold. Our theoretical results show that the proposed algorithm is guaranteed to converge to the fixed point and that the solution is robust to input perturbations, provided that it is initialized close to the true solution. Our empirical results show that the relaxed constraints translate to improved performance and that the approach enjoys robustness to input perturbations similar to MOL.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2023.
Builds on
23 of 33 references.
References · 23
- 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,636
- 2019Deep Equilibrium Modelscited by 615
- 2018fastMRI: An Open Dataset and Benchmarks for Accelerated MRIcited by 470
- 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 414
- 2017MoDL: Model Based Deep Learning Architecture for Inverse Problemscited by 387
- 2017Learning a Variational Network for Reconstruction of Accelerated MRI Datacited by 342
- 2016The Little Engine that Could: Regularization by Denoising (RED)cited by 307
- 2020Deep Learning Techniques for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 291
- 2019On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction - Does AI come at a cost?cited by 212
- 2019Plug-and-Play Methods Provably Converge with Properly Trained Denoiserscited by 198
- 2021Deep Equilibrium Architectures for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 127
- 2020FISTA-Net: Learning A Fast Iterative Shrinkage Thresholding Network for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 74
11 more
- 2018An Online Plug-and-Play Algorithm for Regularized Image Reconstructioncited by 70
- 2020Learning Maximally Monotone Operators for Image Recoverycited by 62
- 2017Plug-and-Play Unplugged: Optimization Free Reconstruction using Consensus Equilibriumcited by 58
- 2020Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks -- Robustness Included?cited by 58
- 2021Measuring Robustness in Deep Learning Based Compressive Sensingcited by 53
- 2020Scalable Plug-and-Play ADMM with Convergence Guaranteescited by 50
- 2022A Neural-Network-Based Convex Regularizer for Inverse Problemscited by 41
- 2021CLIP: Cheap Lipschitz Training of Neural Networkscited by 29
- 2022Memory-efficient model-based deep learning with convergence and robustness guaranteescited by 7
- 2022On the Robustness of deep learning-based MRI Reconstruction to image transformationscited by 7
- 2015Convex Denoising using Non-Convex Tight Frame Regularizationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.