The Case for Scalable, Data-Driven Theory: A Paradigm for Scientific Progress in NLP
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
I propose a paradigm for scientific progress in NLP centered around developing scalable, data-driven theories of linguistic structure. The idea is to collect data in tightly scoped, carefully defined ways which allow for exhaustive annotation of behavioral phenomena of interest, and then use machine learning to construct explanatory theories of these phenomena which can form building blocks for intelligible AI systems. After laying some conceptual groundwork, I describe several investigations into data-driven theories of shallow semantic structure using Question-Answer driven Semantic Role Labeling (QA-SRL), a schema for annotating verbal predicate-argument relations using highly constrained question-answer pairs. While this only scratches the surface of the complex language behaviors of interest in AI, I outline principles for data collection and theoretical modeling which can inform future scientific progress. This note summarizes and draws heavily on my PhD thesis.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2023.
Builds on
26 of 72 references.
References · 26
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
- 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,067
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 671
- 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 438
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 383
- 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 354
- 2016Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehensioncited by 278
- 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 263
14 more
- 2022The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspectivecited by 258
- 2017End-to-end Neural Coreference Resolutioncited by 241
- 2018The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answeringcited by 236
- 2018Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inferencecited by 213
- 2018Large-Scale QA-SRL Parsingcited by 45
- 2019Human vs. Muppet: A Conservative Estimate of Human Performance on the GLUE Benchmarkcited by 32
- 2020Do Neural Models Learn Systematicity of Monotonicity Inference in Natural Language?cited by 29
- 2019Question Answering is a Format; When is it Useful?cited by 25
- 2021Asking It All: Generating Contextualized Questions for any Semantic Rolecited by 22
- 2017Crowdsourcing Question-Answer Meaning Representationscited by 21
- 2020Syntactic Search by Examplecited by 20
- 2022Smoothing Entailment Graphs with Language Modelscited by 8
- 2021Decomposing and Recomposing Event Structurecited by 5
- 2019The lexical and grammatical sources of neg-raising inferencescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2026Task Decomposition for Efficient Annotation23 Jun 2026
- 2024Explicating the Implicit: Argument Detection Beyond Sentence Boundaries8 Aug 2024