Negotiated Representations to Prevent Forgetting in Machine Learning Applications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Catastrophic forgetting is a significant challenge in the field of machine learning, particularly in neural networks. When a neural network learns to perform well on a new task, it often forgets its previously acquired knowledge or experiences. This phenomenon occurs because the network adjusts its weights and connections to minimize the loss on the new task, which can inadvertently overwrite or disrupt the representations that were crucial for the previous tasks. As a result, the the performance of the network on earlier tasks deteriorates, limiting its ability to learn and adapt to a sequence of tasks. In this paper, we propose a novel method for preventing catastrophic forgetting in machine learning applications, specifically focusing on neural networks. Our approach aims to preserve the knowledge of the network across multiple tasks while still allowing it to learn new information effectively. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method by conducting experiments on various benchmark datasets, including Split MNIST, Split CIFAR10, Split Fashion MNIST, and Split CIFAR100. These datasets are created by dividing the original datasets into separate, non overlapping tasks, simulating a continual learning scenario where the model needs to learn multiple tasks sequentially without forgetting the previous ones. Our proposed method tackles the catastrophic forgetting problem by incorporating negotiated representations into the learning process, which allows the model to maintain a balance between retaining past experiences and adapting to new tasks. By evaluating our method on these challenging datasets, we aim to showcase its potential for addressing catastrophic forgetting and improving the performance of neural networks in continual learning settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2023.
Builds on
20 of 33 references.
References · 20
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,313
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,313
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
- 2019Large Scale Incremental Learningcited by 727
- 2020Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectivescited by 268
- 2023Class-Incremental Learning: A Surveycited by 209
- 2018Towards Robust Evaluations of Continual Learningcited by 148
- 2020Continual Prototype Evolution: Learning Online from Non-Stationary Data Streamscited by 143
- 2022Class-Incremental Continual Learning into the eXtended DER-versecited by 121
- 2022Class-Incremental Learning by Knowledge Distillation with Adaptive Feature Consolidationcited by 113
8 more
- 2020Generative Feature Replay For Class-Incremental Learningcited by 109
- 2021Essentials for Class Incremental Learningcited by 57
- 2021Is Class-Incremental Enough for Continual Learning?cited by 22
- 2022Challenging Common Assumptions about Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 20
- 2020Into the Unknown: Active Monitoring of Neural Networkscited by 19
- 2021Self-Attention Meta-Learner for Continual Learningcited by 8
- 2021Strengthening the Training of Convolutional Neural Networks By Using Walsh Matrixcited by 3
- 2023Negotiated Representations to Prevent Overfitting in Machine Learning Applicationscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.