How does spatial structure affect psychological restoration? A method based on Graph Neural Networks and Street View Imagery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Attention Restoration Theory (ART) presents a theoretical framework with four essential indicators (being away, extent, fascinating, and compatibility) for comprehending urban and natural restoration quality. However, previous studies relied on non-sequential data and non-spatial dependent methods, which overlooks the impact of spatial structure defined here as the positional relationships between scene entities on restoration quality. The past methods also make it challenging to measure restoration quality on an urban scale. In this work, a spatial-dependent graph neural networks (GNNs) approach is proposed to reveal the relation between spatial structure and restoration quality on an urban scale. Specifically, we constructed two different types of graphs at the street and city levels. The street-level graphs, using sequential street view images (SVIs) of road segments to capture position relationships between entities, were used to represent spatial structure. The city-level graph, modeling the topological relationships of roads as non-Euclidean data structures and embedding urban features (including Perception-features, Spatial-features, and Socioeconomic-features), was used to measure restoration quality. The results demonstrate that: 1) spatial-dependent GNNs model outperforms traditional methods (Acc = 0.735, F1 = 0.732); 2) spatial structure portrayed through sequential SVIs data significantly influences restoration quality; 3) spaces with the same restoration quality exhibited distinct spatial structures patterns. This study clarifies the association between spatial structure and restoration quality, providing a new perspective to improve urban well-being in the future.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2023.
Builds on
7 of 86 references.
References · 7
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2021Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentationcited by 2,351
- 2019Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,477
- 2021Per-Pixel Classification is Not All You Need for Semantic Segmentationcited by 1,152
- 2018Building Instance Classification Using Street View Imagescited by 33
- 2021Assessing bikeability with street view imagery and computer visioncited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.