mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The curse of language biases in remote sensing VQA: the role of spatial attributes, language diversity, and the need for clear evaluation

arXiv 2311.16782 ↗First posted 28 Nov 2023cs.CV cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Remote sensing visual question answering (RSVQA) opens new opportunities for the use of overhead imagery by the general public, by enabling human-machine interaction with natural language. Building on the recent advances in natural language processing and computer vision, the goal of RSVQA is to answer a question formulated in natural language about a remote sensing image. Language understanding is essential to the success of the task, but has not yet been thoroughly examined in RSVQA. In particular, the problem of language biases is often overlooked in the remote sensing community, which can impact model robustness and lead to wrong conclusions about the performances of the model. Thus, the present work aims at highlighting the problem of language biases in RSVQA with a threefold analysis strategy: visual blind models, adversarial testing and dataset analysis. This analysis focuses both on model and data. Moreover, we motivate the use of more informative and complementary evaluation metrics sensitive to the issue. The gravity of language biases in RSVQA is then exposed for all of these methods with the training of models discarding the image data and the manipulation of the visual input during inference. Finally, a detailed analysis of question-answer distribution demonstrates the root of the problem in the data itself. Thanks to this analytical study, we observed that biases in remote sensing are more severe than in standard VQA, likely due to the specifics of existing remote sensing datasets for the task, e.g. geographical similarities and sparsity, as well as a simpler vocabulary and question generation strategies. While new, improved and less-biased datasets appear as a necessity for the development of the promising field of RSVQA, we demonstrate that more informed, relative evaluation metrics remain much needed to transparently communicate results of future RSVQA methods.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2023.

Builds on

41 of 60 references.

References · 41

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  5. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  6. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  7. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  8. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  9. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
  10. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  11. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
  12. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
29 more
  1. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,475
  2. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  3. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,312
  4. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
  5. 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 804
  6. 2021Multimodal Few-Shot Learning with Frozen Language Modelscited by 661
  7. 2017DOTA: A Large-scale Dataset for Object Detection in Aerial Imagescited by 623
  8. 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 376
  9. 2016AID: A Benchmark Dataset for Performance Evaluation of Aerial Scene Classificationcited by 347
  10. 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 339
  11. 2015Skip-Thought Vectorscited by 322
  12. 2021MERLOT: Multimodal Neural Script Knowledge Modelscited by 311
  13. 2015Stacked Attention Networks for Image Question Answeringcited by 273
  14. 2020Counterfactual VQA: A Cause-Effect Look at Language Biascited by 266
  15. 2019BigEarthNet: A Large-Scale Benchmark Archive For Remote Sensing Image Understandingcited by 234
  16. 2020RSVQA: Visual Question Answering for Remote Sensing Datacited by 203
  17. 2020FloodNet: A High Resolution Aerial Imagery Dataset for Post Flood Scene Understandingcited by 181
  18. 2017MUTAN: Multimodal Tucker Fusion for Visual Question Answeringcited by 137
  19. 2020Roses Are Red, Violets Are Blue... but Should Vqa Expect Them To?cited by 69
  20. 2021UFO: A UniFied TransfOrmer for Vision-Language Representation Learningcited by 46
  21. 2016Image Captioning and Visual Question Answering Based on Attributes and External Knowledgecited by 44
  22. 2022From Easy to Hard: Learning Language-guided Curriculum for Visual Question Answering on Remote Sensing Datacited by 39
  23. 2022Commonsense Knowledge Reasoning and Generation with Pre-trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 38
  24. 2022SwapMix: Diagnosing and Regularizing the Over-Reliance on Visual Context in Visual Question Answeringcited by 38
  25. 2021Towards a Collective Agenda on AI for Earth Science Data Analysiscited by 27
  26. 2022The Principles of Data-Centric AI (DCAI)cited by 26
  27. 2022Multi-Modal Fusion Transformer for Visual Question Answering in Remote Sensingcited by 13
  28. 2021How to find a good image-text embedding for remote sensing visual question answering?cited by 6
  29. 2021Challenges and Solutions for Utilizing Earth Observations in the "Big Data" eracited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.