On robust overfitting: adversarial training induced distribution matters
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial training may be regarded as standard training with a modified loss function. But its generalization error appears much larger than standard training under standard loss. This phenomenon, known as robust overfitting, has attracted significant research attention and remains largely as a mystery. In this paper, we first show empirically that robust overfitting correlates with the increasing generalization difficulty of the perturbation-induced distributions along the trajectory of adversarial training (specifically PGD-based adversarial training). We then provide a novel upper bound for generalization error with respect to the perturbation-induced distributions, in which a notion of the perturbation operator, referred to "local dispersion", plays an important role. Experimental results are presented to validate the usefulness of the bound and various additional insights are provided.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2023.
Builds on
34 of 46 references.
References · 34
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
- 2017Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Trainingcited by 337
22 more
- 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
- 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 279
- 2017PixelDefend: Leveraging Generative Models to Understand and Defend against Adversarial Examplescited by 244
- 2018Disentangling Adversarial Robustness and Generalizationcited by 172
- 2019Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization: Theory and Applications in Machine Learningcited by 170
- 2018Rademacher Complexity for Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 132
- 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 132
- 2019VC Classes are Adversarially Robustly Learnable, but Only Improperlycited by 83
- 2021Relating Adversarially Robust Generalization to Flat Minimacited by 57
- 2021Exploring Memorization in Adversarial Trainingcited by 55
- 2020Adversarial Learning Guarantees for Linear Hypotheses and Neural Networkscited by 47
- 2022A Survey of Robust Adversarial Training in Pattern Recognition: Fundamental, Theory, and Methodologiescited by 44
- 2018On the Geometry of Adversarial Examplescited by 43
- 2022A Unified Wasserstein Distributional Robustness Framework for Adversarial Trainingcited by 36
- 2021Low Curvature Activations Reduce Overfitting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 29
- 2018PAC-learning in the presence of evasion adversariescited by 23
- 2020A Closer Look at Accuracy vs. Robustnesscited by 14
- 2019Inductive Bias of Gradient Descent based Adversarial Training on Separable Datacited by 12
- 2019Lower Bounds for Adversarially Robust PAC Learningcited by 12
- 2023Certified Robust Neural Networks: Generalization and Corruption Resistancecited by 11
- 2023Adversarial Examples Might be Avoidable: The Role of Data Concentration in Adversarial Robustnesscited by 11
- 2020Adversarial Weight Perturbation Helps Robust Generalizationcited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.