Learning with Noisy Low-Cost MOS for Image Quality Assessment via Dual-Bias Calibration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning based image quality assessment (IQA) models have obtained impressive performance with the help of reliable subjective quality labels, where mean opinion score (MOS) is the most popular choice. However, in view of the subjective bias of individual annotators, the labor-abundant MOS (LA-MOS) typically requires a large collection of opinion scores from multiple annotators for each image, which significantly increases the learning cost. In this paper, we aim to learn robust IQA models from low-cost MOS (LC-MOS), which only requires very few opinion scores or even a single opinion score for each image. More specifically, we consider the LC-MOS as the noisy observation of LA-MOS and enforce the IQA model learned from LC-MOS to approach the unbiased estimation of LA-MOS. In this way, we represent the subjective bias between LC-MOS and LA-MOS, and the model bias between IQA predictions learned from LC-MOS and LA-MOS (i.e., dual-bias) as two latent variables with unknown parameters. By means of the expectation-maximization based alternating optimization, we can jointly estimate the parameters of the dual-bias, which suppresses the misleading of LC-MOS via a gated dual-bias calibration (GDBC) module. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first exploration of robust IQA model learning from noisy low-cost labels. Theoretical analysis and extensive experiments on four popular IQA datasets show that the proposed method is robust toward different bias rates and annotation numbers and significantly outperforms the other learning based IQA models when only LC-MOS is available. Furthermore, we also achieve comparable performance with respect to the other models learned with LA-MOS.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2023.
Builds on
31 of 68 references.
References · 31
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,021
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 939
- 2022MANIQA: Multi-dimension Attention Network for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 518
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
- 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 389
- 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 354
- 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 302
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
19 more
- 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Vision-Language Correspondence: A Multitask Learning Perspectivecited by 278
- 2023TOPIQ: A Top-down Approach from Semantics to Distortions for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 226
- 2015Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Qualitycited by 208
- 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 166
- 2020MetaIQA: Deep Meta-learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 144
- 2020Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 134
- 2018A Closer Look at Deep Learning Heuristics: Learning rate restarts, Warmup and Distillationcited by 110
- 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
- 2019Self-Knowledge Distillation in Natural Language Processingcited by 60
- 2016Image Aesthetic Assessment: An Experimental Surveycited by 50
- 2021GraphIQA: Learning Distortion Graph Representations for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 43
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels via Sparse Regularizationcited by 39
- 2021Continual Learning for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 36
- 2022Perceptual Quality Assessment of Omnidirectional Imagescited by 34
- 2022Perceptual Attacks of No-Reference Image Quality Models with Human-in-the-Loopcited by 30
- 2017Towards a quality metric for dense light fieldscited by 15
- 2020A Simple Model for Subject Behavior in Subjective Experimentscited by 15
- 2014Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Image: A Surveycited by 14
- 2017A Perceptually Weighted Rank Correlation Indicator for Objective Image Quality Assessmentcited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.