mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Applying statistical learning theory to deep learning

arXiv 2311.15404 ↗First posted 26 Nov 2023cs.LG cond-mat.dis-nn stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although statistical learning theory provides a robust framework to understand supervised learning, many theoretical aspects of deep learning remain unclear, in particular how different architectures may lead to inductive bias when trained using gradient based methods. The goal of these lectures is to provide an overview of some of the main questions that arise when attempting to understand deep learning from a learning theory perspective. After a brief reminder on statistical learning theory and stochastic optimization, we discuss implicit bias in the context of benign overfitting. We then move to a general description of the mirror descent algorithm, showing how we may go back and forth between a parameter space and the corresponding function space for a given learning problem, as well as how the geometry of the learning problem may be represented by a metric tensor. Building on this framework, we provide a detailed study of the implicit bias of gradient descent on linear diagonal networks for various regression tasks, showing how the loss function, scale of parameters at initialization and depth of the network may lead to various forms of implicit bias, in particular transitioning between kernel or feature learning.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2023.

Builds on

25 of 46 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  2. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  3. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
  4. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
  5. 2014Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 569
  6. 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
  7. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
  8. 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 318
  9. 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 308
  10. 2017Nearly-tight VC-dimension and pseudodimension bounds for piecewise linear neural networkscited by 304
  11. 2020Kernel and Rich Regimes in Overparametrized Modelscited by 302
  12. 2020Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Wide Two-layer Neural Networks Trained with the Logistic Losscited by 267
13 more
  1. 2018Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Linear Convolutional Networkscited by 251
  2. 2017The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine Learningcited by 248
  3. 2018To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learningcited by 186
  4. 2016Generalization Properties of Learning with Random Featurescited by 163
  5. 2020Towards Resolving the Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Matrix Factorization: Greedy Low-Rank Learningcited by 148
  6. 2015Path-SGD: Path-Normalized Optimization in Deep Neural Networkscited by 117
  7. 2019A Function Space View of Bounded Norm Infinite Width ReLU Nets: The Multivariate Casecited by 113
  8. 2016Relatively-Smooth Convex Optimization by First-Order Methods, and Applicationscited by 108
  9. 2019How do infinite width bounded norm networks look in function space?cited by 105
  10. 2020Implicit Bias in Deep Linear Classification: Initialization Scale vs Training Accuracycited by 70
  11. 2017SGD Learns the Conjugate Kernel Class of the Networkcited by 54
  12. 2019Lexicographic and Depth-Sensitive Margins in Homogeneous and Non-Homogeneous Deep Modelscited by 53
  13. 2013From average case complexity to improper learning complexitycited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.