mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RAISE -- Radiology AI Safety, an End-to-end lifecycle approach

arXiv 2311.14570 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2023cs.AI physics.med-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The integration of AI into radiology introduces opportunities for improved clinical care provision and efficiency but it demands a meticulous approach to mitigate potential risks as with any other new technology. Beginning with rigorous pre-deployment evaluation and validation, the focus should be on ensuring models meet the highest standards of safety, effectiveness and efficacy for their intended applications. Input and output guardrails implemented during production usage act as an additional layer of protection, identifying and addressing individual failures as they occur. Continuous post-deployment monitoring allows for tracking population-level performance (data drift), fairness, and value delivery over time. Scheduling reviews of post-deployment model performance and educating radiologists about new algorithmic-driven findings is critical for AI to be effective in clinical practice. Recognizing that no single AI solution can provide absolute assurance even when limited to its intended use, the synergistic application of quality assurance at multiple levels - regulatory, clinical, technical, and ethical - is emphasized. Collaborative efforts between stakeholders spanning healthcare systems, industry, academia, and government are imperative to address the multifaceted challenges involved. Trust in AI is an earned privilege, contingent on a broad set of goals, among them transparently demonstrating that the AI adheres to the same rigorous safety, effectiveness and efficacy standards as other established medical technologies. By doing so, developers can instil confidence among providers and patients alike, enabling the responsible scaling of AI and the realization of its potential benefits. The roadmap presented herein aims to expedite the achievement of deployable, reliable, and safe AI in radiology.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2023.

Builds on

7 of 22 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 633
  2. 2022MONAI: An open-source framework for deep learning in healthcarecited by 448
  3. 2019Degenerate Feedback Loops in Recommender Systemscited by 67
  4. 2023FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcarecited by 60
  5. 2017Reverse Classification Accuracy: Predicting Segmentation Performance in the Absence of Ground Truthcited by 35
  6. 2020MRQy: An Open-Source Tool for Quality Control of MR Imaging Datacited by 12
  7. 2022Current State of Community-Driven Radiological AI Deployment in Medical Imagingcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Medical AI Consensus: A Multi-Agent Framework for Radiology Report Generation and Evaluation
  2. 2026Multi-Agent AI System for Radiology Report Structuring and Quality Assurance with Independent Radiologist Evaluation
  3. 2024Artificial Intelligence in the Autonomous Navigation of Endovascular Interventions: A Systematic Review
  4. 2026MARCH: Multi-Agent Radiology Clinical Hierarchy for CT Report Generation
  5. 2024Automated Radiology Report Generation: A Review of Recent Advances
  6. 2026RadOnc-Agent: An LLM-Orchestrated Framework for AI Workflows Across the Radiotherapy Care Pathway
  7. 2024Enhancing Guardrails for Safe and Secure Healthcare AI
  8. 2024How Well Can Modern LLMs Act as Agent Cores in Radiology Environments?