Multi-Agent AI System for Radiology Report Structuring and Quality Assurance with Independent Radiologist Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Purpose: To develop and evaluate a locally deployed multi-agent AI system for radiology report structuring and quality assurance. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 638 radiology reports from CT examinations of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis dictated by 15 board-certified radiologists in 2023 and 2024. A multi-agent AI pipeline was developed to perform report structuring and quality assurance (QA). The system structured the report into standardized anatomical sections at the sentence level using regex rules and local large language models. It also detected mismatches between the Findings and Impression sections, or within sections; gender-anatomy conflicts; and undocumented communication of critical findings. Two board-certified radiologists independently evaluated a 45-report subset. Results: The multi-agent system structured the Findings sections of all reports (22,270 sentences) into a predefined anatomical format while retaining the original report content. The system flagged 90 (14.1%) reports, most commonly for section mismatches (80 reports, 12.5%). In the radiologist evaluation, both reviewers agreed that 31 (69%) were correctly restructured, 2 reports (4%) were incorrectly restructured, and disagreed on the remaining 12 reports (27%). Both reviewers agreed that no clinically important information was omitted and no fabricated content was introduced. Overall QA performance was rated as "excellent" or "good" in 84% of the evaluated reports, with the remaining reports rated as "fair". Conclusion: A locally deployed multi-agent AI system combined radiology report structuring and quality assurance within a single workflow. The system demonstrated favorable performance in radiologist evaluation. Such systems may support standardization of reporting and quality assurance in radiology practice.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.
Builds on
4 of 18 references.
References · 4
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2025Generative Large Language Models Trained for Detecting Errors in Radiology Reportscited by 5
- 2024Improving Radiology Report Conciseness and Structure via Local Large Language Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026MARCH: Multi-Agent Radiology Clinical Hierarchy for CT Report Generation
- 2025Medical AI Consensus: A Multi-Agent Framework for Radiology Report Generation and Evaluation
- 2025A Multimodal Multi-Agent Framework for Radiology Report Generation
- 2026CogRad: A Cognitively-Inspired Multi-Agent Framework for Radiology Report Generation
- 2024Enhancing LLMs for Impression Generation in Radiology Reports through a Multi-Agent System
- 2023Consensus, dissensus and synergy between clinicians and specialist foundation models in radiology report generation
- 2025GEMA-Score: Granular Explainable Multi-Agent Scoring Framework for Radiology Report Evaluation
- 2026AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning