Covariance alignment: from maximum likelihood estimation to Gromov-Wasserstein
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Feature alignment methods are used in many scientific disciplines for data pooling, annotation, and comparison. As an instance of a permutation learning problem, feature alignment presents significant statistical and computational challenges. In this work, we propose the covariance alignment model to study and compare various alignment methods and establish a minimax lower bound for covariance alignment that has a non-standard dimension scaling because of the presence of a nuisance parameter. This lower bound is in fact minimax optimal and is achieved by a natural quasi MLE. However, this estimator involves a search over all permutations which is computationally infeasible even when the problem has moderate size. To overcome this limitation, we show that the celebrated Gromov-Wasserstein algorithm from optimal transport which is more amenable to fast implementation even on large-scale problems is also minimax optimal. These results give the first statistical justification for the deployment of the Gromov-Wasserstein algorithm in practice.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2023.
Builds on
25 of 55 references.
References · 25
- 2017Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iterationcited by 219
- 2019Orthogonal Statistical Learningcited by 150
- 2018Gromov-Wasserstein Alignment of Word Embedding Spacescited by 119
- 2018Unsupervised Alignment of Embeddings with Wasserstein Procrustescited by 96
- 2017Double/Debiased/Neyman Machine Learning of Treatment Effectscited by 76
- 2020The Unbalanced Gromov Wasserstein Distance: Conic Formulation and Relaxationcited by 55
- 2013Regularized Discrete Optimal Transportcited by 54
- 2021Settling the Sharp Reconstruction Thresholds of Random Graph Matchingcited by 45
- 2018Towards Optimal Transport with Global Invariancescited by 33
- 2017Orthogonal Machine Learning: Power and Limitationscited by 28
- 2014Graph Matching: Relax at Your Own Riskcited by 27
- 2020Partial Recovery in the Graph Alignment Problemcited by 27
13 more
- 2022Random graph matching at Otter's threshold via counting chandelierscited by 25
- 2021Exact Matching of Random Graphs with Constant Correlationcited by 23
- 2018Unsupervised Hyperalignment for Multilingual Word Embeddingscited by 17
- 2017Minimax Rates and Efficient Algorithms for Noisy Sortingcited by 15
- 2013Minimax rates in permutation estimation for feature matchingcited by 13
- 2020Isotonic regression with unknown permutations: Statistics, computation, and adaptationcited by 13
- 2023The Fundamental Limits of Structure-Agnostic Functional Estimationcited by 12
- 2016Optimal Rates of Statistical Seriationcited by 10
- 2023A Convergent Single-Loop Algorithm for Relaxation of Gromov-Wasserstein in Graph Datacited by 10
- 2021The planted matching problem: Sharp threshold and infinite-order phase transitioncited by 9
- 2021Optimal detection of the feature matching map in presence of noise and outlierscited by 5
- 2014Estimation of functionals of sparse covariance matricescited by 2
- 2023Optimal transport for automatic alignment of untargeted metabolomic datacited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.