On the Out-of-Distribution Coverage of Combining Split Conformal Prediction and Bayesian Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian deep learning and conformal prediction are two methods that have been used to convey uncertainty and increase safety in machine learning systems. We focus on combining Bayesian deep learning with split conformal prediction and how this combination effects out-of-distribution coverage; particularly in the case of multiclass image classification. We suggest that if the model is generally underconfident on the calibration set, then the resultant conformal sets may exhibit worse out-of-distribution coverage compared to simple predictive credible sets. Conversely, if the model is overconfident on the calibration set, the use of conformal prediction may improve out-of-distribution coverage. We evaluate prediction sets as a result of combining split conformal methods and neural networks trained with (i) stochastic gradient descent, (ii) deep ensembles, and (iii) mean-field variational inference. Our results suggest that combining Bayesian deep learning models with split conformal prediction can, in some cases, cause unintended consequences such as reducing out-of-distribution coverage.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2023.
Builds on
30 of 49 references.
References · 30
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,472
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
- 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 668
- 2019Conformal Prediction Under Covariate Shiftcited by 519
- 2019The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)cited by 509
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
- 2020Classification with Valid and Adaptive Coveragecited by 396
18 more
- 2020Uncertainty Sets for Image Classifiers using Conformal Predictioncited by 366
- 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 365
- 2022Conformal prediction beyond exchangeabilitycited by 355
- 2014Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 343
- 2021What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like?cited by 308
- 2022Conformal Risk Controlcited by 299
- 2016Least Ambiguous Set-Valued Classifiers with Bounded Error Levelscited by 272
- 2021Learn then Test: Calibrating Predictive Algorithms to Achieve Risk Controlcited by 271
- 2021Learning Optimal Conformal Classifierscited by 112
- 2020The Case for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 69
- 2022Conformal Prediction Under Feedback Covariate Shift for Biomolecular Designcited by 54
- 2022On Uncertainty, Tempering, and Data Augmentation in Bayesian Classificationcited by 46
- 2021Conformal Bayesian Computationcited by 39
- 2021Valid prediction intervals for regression problemscited by 29
- 2022Bayesian Optimization with Conformal Prediction Setscited by 28
- 2021Bayes-optimal prediction with frequentist coverage controlcited by 20
- 2020Empirical Frequentist Coverage of Deep Learning Uncertainty Quantification Procedurescited by 19
- 2023Calibration of Neural Networkscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.