Trustworthy AI: Deciding What to Decide
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When engaging in strategic decision-making, we are frequently confronted with overwhelming information and data. The situation can be further complicated when certain pieces of evidence contradict each other or become paradoxical. The primary challenge is how to determine which information can be trusted when we adopt Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems for decision-making. This issue is known as deciding what to decide or Trustworthy AI. However, the AI system itself is often considered an opaque black box. We propose a new approach to address this issue by introducing a novel framework of Trustworthy AI (TAI) encompassing three crucial components of AI: representation space, loss function, and optimizer. Each component is loosely coupled with four TAI properties. Altogether, the framework consists of twelve TAI properties. We aim to use this framework to conduct the TAI experiments by quantitive and qualitative research methods to satisfy TAI properties for the decision-making context. The framework allows us to formulate an optimal prediction model trained by the given dataset for applying the strategic investment decision of credit default swaps (CDS) in the technology sector. Finally, we provide our view of the future direction of TAI research
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2023.
Builds on
20 of 51 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 1,981
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2022TimesNet: Temporal 2D-Variation Modeling for General Time Series Analysiscited by 1,030
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
- 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
- 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 252
- 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
- 2021Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Modelscited by 136
- 2021A Survey of Visual Transformerscited by 117
8 more
- 2020Trustworthy AIcited by 62
- 2021How can I choose an explainer? An Application-grounded Evaluation of Post-hoc Explanationscited by 58
- 2019CERTIFAI: Counterfactual Explanations for Robustness, Transparency, Interpretability, and Fairness of Artificial Intelligence modelscited by 34
- 2023Getting from Generative AI to Trustworthy AI: What LLMs might learn from Cyccited by 19
- 2014The Evolution of Boosting Algorithms - From Machine Learning to Statistical Modellingcited by 18
- 2021Meaningful human control: actionable properties for AI system developmentcited by 18
- 2019Gradient Boosting Machine: A Surveycited by 7
- 2022Strategic Decisions Survey, Taxonomy, and Future Directions from Artificial Intelligence Perspectivecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.