mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Resilient Control of Networked Microgrids using Vertical Federated Reinforcement Learning: Designs and Real-Time Test-Bed Validations

arXiv 2311.12264 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2023eess.SY cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Improving system-level resiliency of networked microgrids is an important aspect with increased population of inverter-based resources (IBRs). This paper (1) presents resilient control design in presence of adversarial cyber-events, and proposes a novel federated reinforcement learning (Fed-RL) approach to tackle (a) model complexities, unknown dynamical behaviors of IBR devices, (b) privacy issues regarding data sharing in multi-party-owned networked grids, and (2) transfers learned controls from simulation to hardware-in-the-loop test-bed, thereby bridging the gap between simulation and real world. With these multi-prong objectives, first, we formulate a reinforcement learning (RL) training setup generating episodic trajectories with adversaries (attack signal) injected at the primary controllers of the grid forming (GFM) inverters where RL agents (or controllers) are being trained to mitigate the injected attacks. For networked microgrids, the horizontal Fed-RL method involving distinct independent environments is not appropriate, leading us to develop vertical variant Federated Soft Actor-Critic (FedSAC) algorithm to grasp the interconnected dynamics of networked microgrid. Next, utilizing OpenAI Gym interface, we built a custom simulation set-up in GridLAB-D/HELICS co-simulation platform, named Resilient RL Co-simulation (ResRLCoSIM), to train the RL agents with IEEE 123-bus benchmark test systems comprising 3 interconnected microgrids. Finally, the learned policies in simulation world are transferred to the real-time hardware-in-the-loop test-bed set-up developed using high-fidelity Hypersim platform. Experiments show that the simulator-trained RL controllers produce convincing results with the real-time test-bed set-up, validating the minimization of sim-to-real gap.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2023.

Builds on

17 of 74 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  4. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  5. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
  6. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  7. 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 826
  8. 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 555
  9. 2021Federated Reinforcement Learning: Techniques, Applications, and Open Challengescited by 79
  10. 2021Reinforcement Learning for Selective Key Applications in Power Systems: Recent Advances and Future Challengescited by 40
  11. 2019Federated Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 34
  12. 2022Wind Power Forecasting Considering Data Privacy Protection: A Federated Deep Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 12
5 more
  1. 2022Federated Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach via Physics-Informed Reward for Multi-Microgrid Energy Managementcited by 11
  2. 2018A Learning-based Power Management for Networked Microgrids Under Incomplete Informationcited by 5
  3. 2020Coordinated Frequency and Voltage Regulation of Grid-Following and Grid-Forming Inverterscited by 2
  4. 2021Scalable Voltage Control using Structure-Driven Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  5. 2022Enhancing Cyber Resilience of Networked Microgrids using Vertical Federated Reinforcement Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.