Predicting urban tree cover from incomplete point labels and limited background information
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Trees inside cities are important for the urban microclimate, contributing positively to the physical and mental health of the urban dwellers. Despite their importance, often only limited information about city trees is available. Therefore in this paper, we propose a method for mapping urban trees in high-resolution aerial imagery using limited datasets and deep learning. Deep learning has become best-practice for this task, however, existing approaches rely on large and accurately labelled training datasets, which can be difficult and expensive to obtain. However, often noisy and incomplete data may be available that can be combined and utilized to solve more difficult tasks than those datasets were intended for. This paper studies how to combine accurate point labels of urban trees along streets with crowd-sourced annotations from an open geographic database to delineate city trees in remote sensing images, a task which is challenging even for humans. To that end, we perform semantic segmentation of very high resolution aerial imagery using a fully convolutional neural network. The main challenge is that our segmentation maps are sparsely annotated and incomplete. Small areas around the point labels of the street trees coming from official and crowd-sourced data are marked as foreground class. Crowd-sourced annotations of streets, buildings, etc. define the background class. Since the tree data is incomplete, we introduce a masking to avoid class confusion. Our experiments in Hamburg, Germany, showed that the system is able to produce tree cover maps, not limited to trees along streets, without providing tree delineations. We evaluated the method on manually labelled trees and show that performance drastically deteriorates if the open geographic database is not used.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2023.
Builds on
12 of 33 references.
References · 12
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
- 2016ScribbleSup: Scribble-Supervised Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 330
- 2015BoxSup: Exploiting Bounding Boxes to Supervise Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 238
- 2017Deep Extreme Cut: From Extreme Points to Object Segmentationcited by 127
- 2016OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networkscited by 109
- 2023Distilling Self-Supervised Vision Transformers for Weakly-Supervised Few-Shot Classification & Segmentationcited by 24
- 2023The Devil is in the Points: Weakly Semi-Supervised Instance Segmentation via Point-Guided Mask Representationcited by 21
- 2023Weakly supervised segmentation with point annotations for histopathology images via contrast-based variational modelcited by 13
- 2022Individual Tree Detection in Large-Scale Urban Environments using High-Resolution Multispectral Imagerycited by 11
- 2021Point-supervised Segmentation of Microscopy Images and Volumes via Objectness Regularizationcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.