mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Detection: Unveiling Fairness Vulnerabilities in Abusive Language Models

arXiv 2311.09428 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work investigates the potential of undermining both fairness and detection performance in abusive language detection. In a dynamic and complex digital world, it is crucial to investigate the vulnerabilities of these detection models to adversarial fairness attacks to improve their fairness robustness. We propose a simple yet effective framework FABLE that leverages backdoor attacks as they allow targeted control over the fairness and detection performance. FABLE explores three types of trigger designs (i.e., rare, artificial, and natural triggers) and novel sampling strategies. Specifically, the adversary can inject triggers into samples in the minority group with the favored outcome (i.e., "non-abusive") and flip their labels to the unfavored outcome, i.e., "abusive". Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of FABLE attacking fairness and utility in abusive language detection.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2023.

Builds on

24 of 44 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  4. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  5. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  6. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
  7. 2020Weight Poisoning Attacks on Pre-trained Modelscited by 318
  8. 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
  9. 2018Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learningcited by 219
  10. 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 208
  11. 2018Reducing Gender Bias in Abusive Language Detectioncited by 152
  12. 2021Mind the Style of Text! Adversarial and Backdoor Attacks Based on Text Style Transfercited by 147
12 more
  1. 2018Stronger Data Poisoning Attacks Break Data Sanitization Defensescited by 125
  2. 2020Backdoor Attacks and Countermeasures on Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 120
  3. 2017Deceiving Google's Perspective API Built for Detecting Toxic Commentscited by 99
  4. 2018Technical Report: When Does Machine Learning FAIL? Generalized Transferability for Evasion and Poisoning Attackscited by 78
  5. 2020Demoting Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detectioncited by 62
  6. 2018All You Need is "Love": Evading Hate-speech Detectioncited by 56
  7. 2020Demographics Should Not Be the Reason of Toxicity: Mitigating Discrimination in Text Classifications with Instance Weightingcited by 41
  8. 2020Stereotypical Bias Removal for Hate Speech Detection Task using Knowledge-based Generalizationscited by 40
  9. 2020Adversarial Deep Ensemble: Evasion Attacks and Defenses for Malware Detectioncited by 33
  10. 2021Poisoning Attacks on Fair Machine Learningcited by 19
  11. 2020Natural Backdoor Attack on Text Datacited by 18
  12. 2022Towards Fair Classification against Poisoning Attackscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.