mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Safety, Trust, and Ethics Considerations for Human-AI Teaming in Aerospace Control

arXiv 2311.08943 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2023cs.CY cs.AI cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Designing a safe, trusted, and ethical AI may be practically impossible; however, designing AI with safe, trusted, and ethical use in mind is possible and necessary in safety and mission-critical domains like aerospace. Safe, trusted, and ethical use of AI are often used interchangeably; however, a system can be safely used but not trusted or ethical, have a trusted use that is not safe or ethical, and have an ethical use that is not safe or trusted. This manuscript serves as a primer to illuminate the nuanced differences between these concepts, with a specific focus on applications of Human-AI teaming in aerospace system control, where humans may be in, on, or out-of-the-loop of decision-making.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 117 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2023.

Builds on

8 of 117 references.

References · 8

  1. 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,220
  2. 2023Reaching the Limit in Autonomous Racing: Optimal Control versus Reinforcement Learningcited by 111
  3. 2018Deep Neural Network Compression for Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systemscited by 58
  4. 2021Run Time Assurance for Safety-Critical Systems: An Introduction to Safety Filtering Approaches for Complex Control Systemscited by 27
  5. 2018Distributed Wildfire Surveillance with Autonomous Aircraft using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  6. 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning Attitude Control of Fixed-Wing UAVs Using Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 17
  7. 2019Adaptive Guidance and Integrated Navigation with Reinforcement Meta-Learningcited by 6
  8. 2020Autonomous Six-Degree-of-Freedom Spacecraft Docking Maneuvers via Reinforcement Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.