Anti-LM Decoding for Zero-shot In-context Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Zero-shot In-context learning is the phenomenon where models can perform the task simply given the instructions. However, pre-trained large language models are known to be poorly calibrated for this task. One of the most effective approaches to handling this bias is to adopt a contrastive decoding objective, which accounts for the prior probability of generating the next token by conditioning on some context. This work introduces an Anti-Language Model objective with a decay factor designed to address the weaknesses of In-context Machine Translation. We conduct our experiments across 3 model types and sizes, 3 language directions, and for both greedy decoding and beam search (B=5). The proposed method outperforms other state-of-art decoding objectives, with up to 20 BLEU point improvement from the default objective observed in some settings.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2023.
Builds on
27 of 45 references.
References · 27
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
- 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,068
- 2021An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inferencecited by 915
- 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 599
- 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 598
15 more
- 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 556
- 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 434
- 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 319
- 2021Few-shot Learning with Multilingual Language Modelscited by 278
- 2021Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Rightcited by 256
- 2017Beam Search Strategies for Neural Machine Translationcited by 232
- 2023Large Language Models as General Pattern Machinescited by 196
- 2022Mutual Information Alleviates Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 67
- 2019Improved Zero-shot Neural Machine Translation via Ignoring Spurious Correlationscited by 61
- 2023Mitigating Hallucinations and Off-target Machine Translation with Source-Contrastive and Language-Contrastive Decodingcited by 42
- 2020Decoding Methods for Neural Narrative Generationcited by 18
- 2023A Frustratingly Simple Decoding Method for Neural Text Generationcited by 16
- 2020Decoding and Diversity in Machine Translationcited by 15
- 2023Pointwise Mutual Information Based Metric and Decoding Strategy for Faithful Generation in Document Grounded Dialogscited by 11
- 2023Towards a Better Understanding of Variations in Zero-Shot Neural Machine Translation Performancecited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.