mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automated title and abstract screening for scoping reviews using the GPT-4 Large Language Model

arXiv 2311.07918 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2023cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scoping reviews, a type of literature review, require intensive human effort to screen large numbers of scholarly sources for their relevance to the review objectives. This manuscript introduces GPTscreenR, a package for the R statistical programming language that uses the GPT-4 Large Language Model (LLM) to automatically screen sources. The package makes use of the chain-of-thought technique with the goal of maximising performance on complex screening tasks. In validation against consensus human reviewer decisions, GPTscreenR performed similarly to an alternative zero-shot technique, with a sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 89%, and overall accuracy of 84%. Neither method achieved perfect accuracy nor human levels of intraobserver agreement. GPTscreenR demonstrates the potential for LLMs to support scholarly work and provides a user-friendly software framework that can be integrated into existing review processes.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2023.

Builds on

3 of 27 references.

References · 3

  1. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  2. 2023Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Modelscited by 29
  3. 2023Assessing the Ability of ChatGPT to Screen Articles for Systematic Reviewscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Streamlining Systematic Reviews: A Novel Application of Large Language Models
  2. 2025MMReview: A Multidisciplinary and Multimodal Benchmark for LLM-Based Peer Review Automation
  3. 2026Evaluating AI-based Scientific Knowledge Synthesis with Epidemiological Systematic Reviews
  4. 2025Can Large Language Models Match the Conclusions of Systematic Reviews?
  5. 2026Checkpoints Are Not Enough: Trust Calibration in CoSLR, a Human-AI System for Systematic Literature Reviews
  6. 2025LatteReview: A Multi-Agent Framework for Systematic Review Automation Using Large Language Models
  7. 2025ReviewAgents: Bridging the Gap Between Human and AI-Generated Paper Reviews
  8. 2024CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Review