On The Truthfulness of 'Surprisingly Likely' Responses of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The principle of rewarding a crowd for surprisingly common answers has been used in the literature for designing a number of truthful information elicitation mechanisms. A related method has also been proposed in the literature for better aggregation of crowd wisdom. Drawing a comparison between crowd based collective intelligence systems and large language models, we define the notion of 'surprisingly likely' textual response of a large language model. This notion is inspired by the surprisingly common principle, but tailored for text in a language model. Using benchmarks such as TruthfulQA and openly available LLMs: GPT-2 and LLaMA-2, we show that the surprisingly likely textual responses of large language models are more accurate in many cases compared to standard baselines. For example, we observe up to 24 percentage points aggregate improvement on TruthfulQA and up to 70 percentage points improvement on individual categories of questions in this benchmark. We also provide further analysis of the results, including the cases when surprisingly likely responses are less or not more accurate.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2023.
Builds on
25 of 51 references.
References · 25
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2016A Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Deeper Understanding of Commonsense Storiescited by 417
13 more
- 2023DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 376
- 2021Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Rightcited by 263
- 2023Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategiescited by 238
- 2021On Hallucination and Predictive Uncertainty in Conditional Language Generationcited by 176
- 2023Cognitive Mirage: A Review of Hallucinations in Large Language Modelscited by 84
- 2022Mutual Information Alleviates Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 68
- 2019Target-Guided Open-Domain Conversationcited by 66
- 2016Sequence to Backward and Forward Sequences: A Content-Introducing Approach to Generative Short-Text Conversationcited by 35
- 2013Crowdsourced Judgement Elicitation with Endogenous Proficiencycited by 30
- 2016Informed Truthfulness in Multi-Task Peer Predictioncited by 25
- 2019Unsupervised Context Rewriting for Open Domain Conversationcited by 14
- 2022Probing Factually Grounded Content Transfer with Factual Ablationcited by 7
- 2017Peer Truth Serum: Incentives for Crowdsourcing Measurements and Opinionscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.