Peer Truth Serum: Incentives for Crowdsourcing Measurements and Opinions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern decision making tools are based on statistical analysis of abundant data, which is often collected by querying multiple individuals. We consider data collection through crowdsourcing, where independent and self-interested agents, non-experts, report measurements, such as sensor readings, opinions, such as product reviews, or answers to human intelligence tasks. Since the accuracy of information is positively correlated with the effort invested in obtaining it, self-interested agents tend to report low-quality data. Therefore, there is a need for incentives that cover the cost of effort, while discouraging random reports. We propose a novel incentive mechanism called Peer Truth Serum that encourages truthful and accurate reporting, showing that it is the unique mechanism to satisfy a combination of desirable properties.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Spot Check Equivalence: an Interpretable Metric for Information Elicitation Mechanismscited by 4
- 2025Stochastically Dominant Peer Predictioncited by 1
- 2023On The Truthfulness of 'Surprisingly Likely' Responses of Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Incentivizing Truthfulness and Collaborative Fairness in Bayesian Learningcited by 0
- 2026Incentivizing Truthfulness and Collaborative Fairness in Bayesian Learning12 May 2026
- 2025Stochastically Dominant Peer Prediction2 Jun 2025
- 2024Spot Check Equivalence: an Interpretable Metric for Information Elicitation Mechanisms21 Feb 2024
- 2023On The Truthfulness of 'Surprisingly Likely' Responses of Large Language Models13 Nov 2023