mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hallucination Augmented Recitations for Language Models

arXiv 2311.07424 ↗First posted 13 Nov 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Attribution is a key concept in large language models (LLMs) as it enables control over information sources and enhances the factuality of LLMs. While existing approaches utilize open book question answering to improve attribution, factual datasets may reward language models to recall facts that they already know from their pretraining data, not attribution. In contrast, counterfactual open book QA datasets would further improve attribution because the answer could only be grounded in the given text. We propose Hallucination Augmented Recitations (HAR) for creating counterfactual datasets by utilizing hallucination in LLMs to improve attribution. For open book QA as a case study, we demonstrate that models finetuned with our counterfactual datasets improve text grounding, leading to better open book QA performance, with up to an 8.0% increase in F1 score. Our counterfactual dataset leads to significantly better performance than using humanannotated factual datasets, even with 4x smaller datasets and 4x smaller models. We observe that improvements are consistent across various model sizes and datasets, including multi-hop, biomedical, and adversarial QA datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2023.

Builds on

28 of 40 references.

References · 28

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  4. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  5. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  6. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  7. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  8. 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
  9. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 428
  10. 2020AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain Questionscited by 385
  11. 2023A Survey of Hallucination in Large Foundation Modelscited by 365
  12. 2021Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answeringcited by 349
16 more
  1. 2023FreshLLMs: Refreshing Large Language Models with Search Engine Augmentationcited by 308
  2. 2022RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Modelscited by 286
  3. 2021Measuring Attribution in Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 253
  4. 2023Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Through Counterfactual Taskscited by 243
  5. 2020Measuring and Reducing Gendered Correlations in Pre-trained Modelscited by 222
  6. 2021What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding?cited by 200
  7. 2022WANLI: Worker and AI Collaboration for Natural Language Inference Dataset Creationcited by 200
  8. 2021PAQ: 65 Million Probably-Asked Questions and What You Can Do With Themcited by 198
  9. 2019MRQA 2019 Shared Task: Evaluating Generalization in Reading Comprehensioncited by 183
  10. 2020Beat the AI: Investigating Adversarial Human Annotation for Reading Comprehensioncited by 131
  11. 2019Counterfactual Story Reasoning and Generationcited by 87
  12. 2021Improving Question Answering Model Robustness with Synthetic Adversarial Data Generationcited by 77
  13. 2023LongForm: Effective Instruction Tuning with Reverse Instructionscited by 47
  14. 2021Retrieval-guided Counterfactual Generation for QAcited by 28
  15. 2021Connecting Attributions and QA Model Behavior on Realistic Counterfactualscited by 20
  16. 2021Learning with Instance Bundles for Reading Comprehensioncited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

5 papers.