mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adaptive recurrent vision performs zero-shot computation scaling to unseen difficulty levels

arXiv 2311.06964 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Humans solving algorithmic (or) reasoning problems typically exhibit solution times that grow as a function of problem difficulty. Adaptive recurrent neural networks have been shown to exhibit this property for various language-processing tasks. However, little work has been performed to assess whether such adaptive computation can also enable vision models to extrapolate solutions beyond their training distribution's difficulty level, with prior work focusing on very simple tasks. In this study, we investigate a critical functional role of such adaptive processing using recurrent neural networks: to dynamically scale computational resources conditional on input requirements that allow for zero-shot generalization to novel difficulty levels not seen during training using two challenging visual reasoning tasks: PathFinder and Mazes. We combine convolutional recurrent neural networks (ConvRNNs) with a learnable halting mechanism based on Graves (2016). We explore various implementations of such adaptive ConvRNNs (AdRNNs) ranging from tying weights across layers to more sophisticated biologically inspired recurrent networks that possess lateral connections and gating. We show that 1) AdRNNs learn to dynamically halt processing early (or late) to solve easier (or harder) problems, 2) these RNNs zero-shot generalize to more difficult problem settings not shown during training by dynamically increasing the number of recurrent iterations at test time. Our study provides modeling evidence supporting the hypothesis that recurrent processing enables the functional advantage of adaptively allocating compute resources conditional on input requirements and hence allowing generalization to harder difficulty levels of a visual reasoning problem without training.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2023.

Builds on

15 of 29 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  2. 2020Long Range Arena: A Benchmark for Efficient Transformerscited by 700
  3. 2016Adaptive Computation Time for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 506
  4. 2021PonderNet: Learning to Pondercited by 168
  5. 2015Delving Deeper into Convolutional Networks for Learning Video Representationscited by 148
  6. 2021Can You Learn an Algorithm? Generalizing from Easy to Hard Problems with Recurrent Networkscited by 117
  7. 2018Learning long-range spatial dependencies with horizontal gated-recurrent unitscited by 98
  8. 2018Stable Recurrent Modelscited by 66
  9. 2016Bridging the Gaps Between Residual Learning, Recurrent Neural Networks and Visual Cortexcited by 42
  10. 2022End-to-end Algorithm Synthesis with Recurrent Networks: Logical Extrapolation Without Overthinkingcited by 33
  11. 2020Stable and expressive recurrent vision modelscited by 20
  12. 2020Differentiable Adaptive Computation Time for Visual Reasoningcited by 12
3 more
  1. 2013Understanding Deep Architectures using a Recursive Convolutional Networkcited by 11
  2. 2021The Uncanny Similarity of Recurrence and Depthcited by 9
  3. 2021Improving Anytime Prediction with Parallel Cascaded Networks and a Temporal-Difference Losscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Emulating Human-like Adaptive Vision for Efficient and Flexible Machine Visual Perception
  2. 2026When Adaptation Fails: A Gradient-Based Diagnosis of Collapsed Gating in Vision-Language Prompt Learning
  3. 2025DeepEyes: Incentivizing "Thinking with Images" via Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026Addressing Overthinking in Large Vision-Language Models via Gated Perception-Reasoning Optimization
  5. 2025Reasoning in machine vision by learning fast and slow thinking
  6. 2022GAMR: A Guided Attention Model for (visual) Reasoning
  7. 2023The role of object-centric representations, guided attention, and external memory on generalizing visual relations
  8. 2026Act, Think or Abstain: Complexity-Aware Adaptive Inference for Vision-Language-Action Models