Understanding Deep Architectures using a Recursive Convolutional Network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A key challenge in designing convolutional network models is sizing them appropriately. Many factors are involved in these decisions, including number of layers, feature maps, kernel sizes, etc. Complicating this further is the fact that each of these influence not only the numbers and dimensions of the activation units, but also the total number of parameters. In this paper we focus on assessing the independent contributions of three of these linked variables: The numbers of layers, feature maps, and parameters. To accomplish this, we employ a recursive convolutional network whose weights are tied between layers; this allows us to vary each of the three factors in a controlled setting. We find that while increasing the numbers of layers and parameters each have clear benefit, the number of feature maps (and hence dimensionality of the representation) appears ancillary, and finds most of its benefit through the introduction of more weights. Our results (i) empirically confirm the notion that adding layers alone increases computational power, within the context of convolutional layers, and (ii) suggest that precise sizing of convolutional feature map dimensions is itself of little concern; more attention should be paid to the number of parameters in these layers instead.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Dec 2013.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2024Relaxed Recursive Transformers: Effective Parameter Sharing with Layer-wise LoRAcited by 72
- 2021Non-deep Networkscited by 14
- 2021The Uncanny Similarity of Recurrence and Depthcited by 9
- 2022Latent Iterative Refinement for Modular Source Separationcited by 6
- 2023Adaptive recurrent vision performs zero-shot computation scaling to unseen difficulty levelscited by 6
- 2025Zero Token-Driven Deep Thinking in LLMs: Unlocking the Full Potential of Existing Parameters via Cyclic Refinementcited by 5
- 2021VSpSR: Explorable Super-Resolution via Variational Sparse Representationcited by 4
- 2025Learning to Stop Overthinking at Test Timecited by 4
- 2024Beyond the Black Box: Do More Complex Deep Learning Models Provide Superior XAI Explanations?cited by 1
- 2025Traveling Waves Integrate Spatial Information Through Timecited by 0
- 2026Scaling Vision Models Does Not Consistently Improve Localisation-Based Explanation Qualitycited by 0
- 2026Scaling Vision Models Does Not Consistently Improve Localisation-Based Explanation Quality11 May 2026
- 2025Zero Token-Driven Deep Thinking in LLMs: Unlocking the Full Potential of Existing Parameters via Cyclic Refinement17 Feb 2025
- 2025Learning to Stop Overthinking at Test Time16 Feb 2025
- 2025Traveling Waves Integrate Spatial Information Through Time9 Feb 2025
- 2024Relaxed Recursive Transformers: Effective Parameter Sharing with Layer-wise LoRA28 Oct 2024
- 2024Beyond the Black Box: Do More Complex Deep Learning Models Provide Superior XAI Explanations?14 May 2024
- 2023Adaptive recurrent vision performs zero-shot computation scaling to unseen difficulty levels12 Nov 2023
- 2022Latent Iterative Refinement for Modular Source Separation22 Nov 2022
- 2021Non-deep Networks14 Oct 2021
- 2021VSpSR: Explorable Super-Resolution via Variational Sparse Representation17 Apr 2021
- 2021The Uncanny Similarity of Recurrence and Depth22 Feb 2021