mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Complex to Simple: Unraveling the Cognitive Tree for Reasoning with Small Language Models

arXiv 2311.06754 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2023cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Reasoning is a distinctive human capacity, enabling us to address complex problems by breaking them down into a series of manageable cognitive steps. Yet, complex logical reasoning is still cumbersome for language models. Based on the dual process theory in cognitive science, we are the first to unravel the cognitive reasoning abilities of language models. Our framework employs an iterative methodology to construct a Cognitive Tree (CogTree). The root node of this tree represents the initial query, while the leaf nodes consist of straightforward questions that can be answered directly. This construction involves two main components: the implicit extraction module (referred to as the intuitive system) and the explicit reasoning module (referred to as the reflective system). The intuitive system rapidly generates multiple responses by utilizing in-context examples, while the reflective system scores these responses using comparative learning. The scores guide the intuitive system in its subsequent generation step. Our experimental results on two popular and challenging reasoning tasks indicate that it is possible to achieve a performance level comparable to that of GPT-3.5 (with 175B parameters), using a significantly smaller language model that contains fewer parameters (<=7B) than 5% of GPT-3.5.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2023.

Builds on

16 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Explicit Planning Helps Language Models in Logical Reasoning28 Mar
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models27 Feb
  3. 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Models7 Oct
  4. 2022Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical Reasoning19 May

Other references · 12

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  3. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  4. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  5. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  6. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
  7. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  8. 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,397
  9. 2023MathPrompter: Mathematical Reasoning using Large Language Modelscited by 236
  10. 2023REFINER: Reasoning Feedback on Intermediate Representationscited by 203
  11. 2023Why think step by step? Reasoning emerges from the locality of experiencecited by 103
  12. 2020Explaining Question Answering Models through Text Generationcited by 33

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey
  2. 2025Cognitive Foundations for Reasoning and Their Manifestation in LLMs
  3. 2025Mapping the Minds of LLMs: A Graph-Based Analysis of Reasoning LLM
  4. 2024Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models -- A Survey
  5. 2024The Role of Deductive and Inductive Reasoning in Large Language Models
  6. 2024Conceptual and Unbiased Reasoning in Language Models
  7. 2025Understanding and Steering the Cognitive Behaviors of Reasoning Models at Test-Time
  8. 2024Comparing Inferential Strategies of Humans and Large Language Models in Deductive Reasoning