Separating the Wheat from the Chaff with BREAD: An open-source benchmark and metrics to detect redundancy in text
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data quality is a problem that perpetually resurfaces throughout the field of NLP, regardless of task, domain, or architecture, and remains especially severe for lower-resource languages. A typical and insidious issue, affecting both training data and model output, is data that is repetitive and dominated by linguistically uninteresting boilerplate, such as price catalogs or computer-generated log files. Though this problem permeates many web-scraped corpora, there has yet to be a benchmark to test against, or a systematic study to find simple metrics that generalize across languages and agree with human judgements of data quality. In the present work, we create and release BREAD, a human-labeled benchmark on repetitive boilerplate vs. plausible linguistic content, spanning 360 languages. We release several baseline CRED (Character REDundancy) scores along with it, and evaluate their effectiveness on BREAD. We hope that the community will use this resource to develop better filtering methods, and that our reference implementations of CRED scores can become standard corpus evaluation tools, driving the development of cleaner language modeling corpora, especially in low-resource languages.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2023.
Builds on
27 of 57 references.
References · 27
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
- 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 491
- 2021Quality at a Glance: An Audit of Web-Crawled Multilingual Datasetscited by 243
- 2019Task2Vec: Task Embedding for Meta-Learningcited by 205
- 2023MADLAD-400: A Multilingual And Document-Level Large Audited Datasetcited by 181
- 2021To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 163
- 2020Language ID in the Wild: Unexpected Challenges on the Path to a Thousand-Language Web Text Corpuscited by 77
15 more
- 2018On the Impact of Various Types of Noise on Neural Machine Translationcited by 76
- 2022Building Machine Translation Systems for the Next Thousand Languagescited by 69
- 2023Epsilon Sampling Rocks: Investigating Sampling Strategies for Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Machine Translationcited by 58
- 2018Denoising Neural Machine Translation Training with Trusted Data and Online Data Selectioncited by 43
- 2018Dual Conditional Cross-Entropy Filtering of Noisy Parallel Corporacited by 40
- 2017Dynamic Data Selection for Neural Machine Translationcited by 33
- 2019Low-Resource Corpus Filtering using Multilingual Sentence Embeddingscited by 25
- 2019Dynamically Composing Domain-Data Selection with Clean-Data Selection by "Co-Curricular Learning" for Neural Machine Translationcited by 20
- 2019A Survey of Data Quality Measurement and Monitoring Toolscited by 19
- 2017Cynical Selection of Language Model Training Datacited by 13
- 2022Extending F1 metric, probabilistic approachcited by 12
- 2022The Curse of Low Task Diversity: On the Failure of Transfer Learning to Outperform MAML and Their Empirical Equivalencecited by 10
- 2018Dynamic Sentence Sampling for Efficient Training of Neural Machine Translationcited by 6
- 2018Microsoft's Submission to the WMT2018 News Translation Task: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Datacited by 5
- 2016Boosting Neural Machine Translationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.