Privacy-Engineered Value Decomposition Networks for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (Co-MARL), a team of agents must jointly optimize the team's long-term rewards to learn a designated task. Optimizing rewards as a team often requires inter-agent communication and data sharing, leading to potential privacy implications. We assume privacy considerations prohibit the agents from sharing their environment interaction data. Accordingly, we propose Privacy-Engineered Value Decomposition Networks (PE-VDN), a Co-MARL algorithm that models multi-agent coordination while provably safeguarding the confidentiality of the agents' environment interaction data. We integrate three privacy-engineering techniques to redesign the data flows of the VDN algorithm, an existing Co-MARL algorithm that consolidates the agents' environment interaction data to train a central controller that models multi-agent coordination, and develop PE-VDN. In the first technique, we design a distributed computation scheme that eliminates Vanilla VDN's dependency on sharing environment interaction data. Then, we utilize a privacy-preserving multi-party computation protocol to guarantee that the data flows of the distributed computation scheme do not pose new privacy risks. Finally, we enforce differential privacy to preempt inference threats against the agents' training data, past environment interactions, when they take actions based on their neural network predictions. We implement PE-VDN in StarCraft Multi-Agent Competition (SMAC) and show that it achieves 80% of Vanilla VDN's win rate while maintaining differential privacy levels that provide meaningful privacy guarantees. The results demonstrate that PE-VDN can safeguard the confidentiality of agents' environment interaction data without sacrificing multi-agent coordination.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2023.
Builds on
17 of 32 references.
References · 17
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
- 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 475
- 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
- 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
- 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 150
- 2020Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Motion Planning of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 101
- 2020Game-Theoretic Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 92
- 2020Private Reinforcement Learning with PAC and Regret Guaranteescited by 51
- 2019Privacy-preserving Q-Learning with Functional Noise in Continuous State Spacescited by 29
- 2019How You Act Tells a Lot: Privacy-Leakage Attack on Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
- 2022Differentially Private Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 22
5 more
- 2022Trusted AI in Multi-agent Systems: An Overview of Privacy and Security for Distributed Learningcited by 22
- 2019Value Propagation for Decentralized Networked Deep Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
- 2021Survey of Recent Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Algorithms Utilizing Centralized Trainingcited by 16
- 2021Making the Most of Parallel Composition in Differential Privacycited by 9
- 2020Efficient Privacy-Preserving Computation Based on Additive Secret Sharingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024Differentially Private Reinforcement Learning with Self-Play11 Apr 2024