mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Evaluation of Forensic Facial Recognition

arXiv 2311.06145 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2023cs.CV cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in machine learning and computer vision have led to reported facial recognition accuracies surpassing human performance. We question if these systems will translate to real-world forensic scenarios in which a potentially low-resolution, low-quality, partially-occluded image is compared against a standard facial database. We describe the construction of a large-scale synthetic facial dataset along with a controlled facial forensic lineup, the combination of which allows for a controlled evaluation of facial recognition under a range of real-world conditions. Using this synthetic dataset, and a popular dataset of real faces, we evaluate the accuracy of two popular neural-based recognition systems. We find that previously reported face recognition accuracies of more than 95% drop to as low as 65% in this more challenging forensic scenario.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2023.

Builds on

7 of 21 references.

References · 7

  1. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  2. 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 911
  3. 2016Joint Face Detection and Alignment using Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Networkscited by 895
  4. 2018Deep Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 275
  5. 2021SynFace: Face Recognition with Synthetic Datacited by 106
  6. 2022DigiFace-1M: 1 Million Digital Face Images for Face Recognitioncited by 92
  7. 2020Saving Face: Investigating the Ethical Concerns of Facial Recognition Auditingcited by 89

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.