Honest Score Client Selection Scheme: Preventing Federated Learning Label Flipping Attacks in Non-IID Scenarios
On the map: LLM safety and security → Federated unlearning and poisoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) is a promising technology that enables multiple actors to build a joint model without sharing their raw data. The distributed nature makes FL vulnerable to various poisoning attacks, including model poisoning attacks and data poisoning attacks. Today, many byzantine-resilient FL methods have been introduced to mitigate the model poisoning attack, while the effectiveness when defending against data poisoning attacks still remains unclear. In this paper, we focus on the most representative data poisoning attack - "label flipping attack" and monitor its effectiveness when attacking the existing FL methods. The results show that the existing FL methods perform similarly in Independent and identically distributed (IID) settings but fail to maintain the model robustness in Non-IID settings. To mitigate the weaknesses of existing FL methods in Non-IID scenarios, we introduce the Honest Score Client Selection (HSCS) scheme and the corresponding HSCSFL framework. In the HSCSFL, The server collects a clean dataset for evaluation. Under each iteration, the server collects the gradients from clients and then perform HSCS to select aggregation candidates. The server first evaluates the performance of each class of the global model and generates the corresponding risk vector to indicate which class could be potentially attacked. Similarly, the server evaluates the client's model and records the performance of each class as the accuracy vector. The dot product of each client's accuracy vector and global risk vector is generated as the client's host score; only the top p% host score clients are included in the following aggregation. Finally, server aggregates the gradients and uses the outcome to update the global model. The comprehensive experimental results show our HSCSFL effectively enhances the FL robustness and defends against the "label flipping attack."
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 21 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2023.
Builds on
21 of 42 references.
References · 21
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 493
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 346
- 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 288
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 275
- 2018Applied Federated Learning: Improving Google Keyboard Query Suggestionscited by 204
- 2019Fall of Empires: Breaking Byzantine-tolerant SGD by Inner Product Manipulationcited by 141
9 more
- 2019Federated Learning for Emoji Prediction in a Mobile Keyboardcited by 118
- 2022Neurotoxin: Durable Backdoors in Federated Learningcited by 98
- 2021Papaya: Practical, Private, and Scalable Federated Learningcited by 90
- 2019Patient Clustering Improves Efficiency of Federated Machine Learning to predict mortality and hospital stay time using distributed Electronic Medical Recordscited by 72
- 2022MPAF: Model Poisoning Attacks to Federated Learning based on Fake Clientscited by 68
- 2020Cost-Effective Federated Learning Designcited by 62
- 2022A Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning Approach for Efficient Client Selection in Federated Learningcited by 31
- 2019On Defending Against Label Flipping Attacks on Malware Detection Systemscited by 22
- 2017Federated Tensor Factorization for Computational Phenotypingcited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025SoK: Benchmarking Poisoning Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning
- 2023FedDefender: Client-Side Attack-Tolerant Federated Learning
- 2026Dynamic Meta-Layer Aggregation for Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning
- 2021ARFED: Attack-Resistant Federated averaging based on outlier elimination
- 2024Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning: An Overview With Focus on Developing Sybil-based Attacks to Backdoor Augmented Secure Aggregation Protocols
- 2024Federated Learning Under Attack: Exposing Vulnerabilities through Data Poisoning Attacks in Computer Networks
- 2021FedCom: A Byzantine-Robust Local Model Aggregation Rule Using Data Commitment for Federated Learning
- 2025FedGuard: A Diverse-Byzantine-Robust Mechanism for Federated Learning with Major Malicious Clients ↗