Compressed and Sparse Models for Non-Convex Decentralized Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent research highlights frequent model communication as a significant bottleneck to the efficiency of decentralized machine learning (ML), especially for large-scale and over-parameterized neural networks (NNs). To address this, we present Malcom-PSGD, a novel decentralized ML algorithm that combines gradient compression techniques with model sparsification. We promote model sparsity by adding ℓ1 regularization to the objective and present a decentralized proximal SGD method for training. Our approach employs vector source coding and dithering-based quantization for the compressed gradient communication of sparsified models. Our analysis demonstrates that Malcom-PSGD achieves a convergence rate of O(1/√t) with respect to the iterations t, assuming a constant consensus and learning rate. This result is supported by our proof for the convergence of non-convex compressed Proximal SGD methods. Additionally, we conduct a bit analysis, providing a closed-form expression for the communication costs associated with Malcom-PSGD. Numerical results verify our theoretical findings and demonstrate that our method reduces communication costs by approximately 75% when compared to the state-of-the-art.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2023.
Builds on
24 of 46 references.
References · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
- 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 826
- 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 496
- 2017Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Trainingcited by 471
- 2019The Non-IID Data Quagmire of Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 303
- 2019Decentralized Stochastic Optimization and Gossip Algorithms with Compressed Communicationcited by 218
- 2013Mini-batch Stochastic Approximation Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Composite Optimizationcited by 142
- 2019Decentralized Deep Learning with Arbitrary Communication Compressioncited by 109
12 more
- 2018Distributed Stochastic Gradient Tracking Methodscited by 106
- 2019DoubleSqueeze: Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descent with Double-Pass Error-Compensated Compressioncited by 98
- 2018Communication Compression for Decentralized Trainingcited by 87
- 2017Optimal algorithms for smooth and strongly convex distributed optimization in networkscited by 81
- 2022An Improved Analysis of Gradient Tracking for Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 68
- 2019Asynchronous Decentralized SGD with Quantized and Local Updatescited by 35
- 2020PowerGossip: Practical Low-Rank Communication Compression in Decentralized Deep Learningcited by 35
- 2018SparCML: High-Performance Sparse Communication for Machine Learningcited by 34
- 2021A Stochastic Proximal Gradient Framework for Decentralized Non-Convex Composite Optimization: Topology-Independent Sample Complexity and Communication Efficiencycited by 11
- 2023Compressed Decentralized Proximal Stochastic Gradient Method for Nonconvex Composite Problems with Heterogeneous Datacited by 11
- 2022Proximal Stochastic Recursive Momentum Methods for Nonconvex Composite Decentralized Optimizationcited by 10
- 2022DoCoM: Compressed Decentralized Optimization with Near-Optimal Sample Complexitycited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.