Automated Annotation of Scientific Texts for ML-based Keyphrase Extraction and Validation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Advanced omics technologies and facilities generate a wealth of valuable data daily; however, the data often lacks the essential metadata required for researchers to find and search them effectively. The lack of metadata poses a significant challenge in the utilization of these datasets. Machine learning-based metadata extraction techniques have emerged as a potentially viable approach to automatically annotating scientific datasets with the metadata necessary for enabling effective search. Text labeling, usually performed manually, plays a crucial role in validating machine-extracted metadata. However, manual labeling is time-consuming; thus, there is an need to develop automated text labeling techniques in order to accelerate the process of scientific innovation. This need is particularly urgent in fields such as environmental genomics and microbiome science, which have historically received less attention in terms of metadata curation and creation of gold-standard text mining datasets. In this paper, we present two novel automated text labeling approaches for the validation of ML-generated metadata for unlabeled texts, with specific applications in environmental genomics. Our techniques show the potential of two new ways to leverage existing information about the unlabeled texts and the scientific domain. The first technique exploits relationships between different types of data sources related to the same research study, such as publications and proposals. The second technique takes advantage of domain-specific controlled vocabularies or ontologies. In this paper, we detail applying these approaches for ML-generated metadata validation. Our results show that the proposed label assignment approaches can generate both generic and highly-specific text labels for the unlabeled texts, with up to 44% of the labels matching with those suggested by a ML keyword extraction algorithm.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2023.
Builds on
17 of 63 references.
References · 17
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2017The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learningcited by 368
- 2019ScispaCy: Fast and Robust Models for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 244
- 2022Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?cited by 208
- 2021GPT3Mix: Leveraging Large-scale Language Models for Text Augmentationcited by 185
- 2020Data Augmentation using Pre-trained Transformer Modelscited by 168
- 2022Revisiting the Gold Standard: Grounding Summarization Evaluation with Robust Human Evaluationcited by 141
- 2023GeneGPT: Augmenting Large Language Models with Domain Tools for Improved Access to Biomedical Informationcited by 115
- 2021Towards Zero-Label Language Learningcited by 76
5 more
- 2021Neural Data Augmentation via Example Extrapolationcited by 54
- 2020DARE: Data Augmented Relation Extraction with GPT-2cited by 43
- 2019A Review of Keyphrase Extractioncited by 33
- 2020Unsupervised Paraphrase Generation using Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 15
- 2020A little goes a long way: Improving toxic language classification despite data scarcitycited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.