HKTGNN: Hierarchical Knowledge Transferable Graph Neural Network-based Supply Chain Risk Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The strength of a supply chain is an important measure of a country's or region's technical advancement and overall competitiveness. Establishing supply chain risk assessment models for effective management and mitigation of potential risks has become increasingly crucial. As the number of businesses grows, the important relationships become more complicated and difficult to measure. This emphasizes the need of extracting relevant information from graph data. Previously, academics mostly employed knowledge inference to increase the visibility of links between nodes in the supply chain. However, they have not solved the data hunger problem of single node feature characteristics. We propose a hierarchical knowledge transferable graph neural network-based (HKTGNN) supply chain risk assessment model to address these issues. Our approach is based on current graph embedding methods for assessing corporate investment risk assessment. We embed the supply chain network corresponding to individual goods in the supply chain using the graph embedding module, resulting in a directed homogeneous graph with just product nodes. This reduces the complicated supply chain network into a basic product network. It addresses difficulties using the domain difference knowledge transferable module based on centrality, which is presented by the premise that supply chain feature characteristics may be biased in the actual world. Meanwhile, the feature complement and message passing will alleviate the data hunger problem, which is driven by domain differences. Our model outperforms in experiments on a real-world supply chain dataset. We will give an equation to prove that our comparative experiment is both effective and fair.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2023.
Builds on
15 of 36 references.
References · 15
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 835
- 2015Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networkscited by 796
- 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 661
- 2020Graph Neural Networks in Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 494
- 2020GCC: Graph Contrastive Coding for Graph Neural Network Pre-Trainingcited by 463
- 2022GOOD: A Graph Out-of-Distribution Benchmarkcited by 141
- 2021ETA Prediction with Graph Neural Networks in Google Mapscited by 130
- 2021OOD-GNN: Out-of-Distribution Generalized Graph Neural Networkcited by 78
- 2021NRGNN: Learning a Label Noise-Resistant Graph Neural Network on Sparsely and Noisily Labeled Graphscited by 73
- 2023Learning on Graphs with Out-of-Distribution Nodescited by 29
3 more
- 2023Company-as-Tribe: Company Financial Risk Assessment on Tribe-Style Graph with Hierarchical Graph Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2023Predicting the Silent Majority on Graphs: Knowledge Transferable Graph Neural Networkcited by 10
- 2023Generalization Performance of Transfer Learning: Overparameterized and Underparameterized Regimescited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.