Divide & Conquer for Entailment-aware Multi-hop Evidence Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Lexical and semantic matches are commonly used as relevance measurements for information retrieval. Together they estimate the semantic equivalence between the query and the candidates. However, semantic equivalence is not the only relevance signal that needs to be considered when retrieving evidences for multi-hop questions. In this work, we demonstrate that textual entailment relation is another important relevance dimension that should be considered. To retrieve evidences that are either semantically equivalent to or entailed by the question simultaneously, we divide the task of evidence retrieval for multi-hop question answering (QA) into two sub-tasks, i.e., semantic textual similarity and inference similarity retrieval. We propose two ensemble models, EAR and EARnest, which tackle each of the sub-tasks separately and then jointly re-rank sentences with the consideration of the diverse relevance signals. Experimental results on HotpotQA verify that our models not only significantly outperform all the single retrieval models it is based on, but is also more effective than two intuitive ensemble baseline models.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2023.
Builds on
29 of 47 references.
References · 29
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,605
- 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
- 2018The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questionscited by 410
- 2016Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehensioncited by 278
- 2020Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyondcited by 267
- 2019Learning to Retrieve Reasoning Paths over Wikipedia Graph for Question Answeringcited by 147
- 2017A Deep Relevance Matching Model for Ad-hoc Retrievalcited by 126
- 2019Multi-hop Reading Comprehension through Question Decomposition and Rescoringcited by 119
17 more
- 2020Unsupervised Question Decomposition for Question Answeringcited by 118
- 2021End-to-End Training of Neural Retrievers for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 75
- 2016Learning to Match Using Local and Distributed Representations of Text for Web Searchcited by 68
- 2019Answering Complex Open-domain Questions Through Iterative Query Generationcited by 60
- 2021Pyserini: An Easy-to-Use Python Toolkit to Support Replicable IR Research with Sparse and Dense Representationscited by 60
- 2021Revisiting Uncertainty-based Query Strategies for Active Learning with Transformerscited by 60
- 2019Optimizing Rank-based Metrics with Blackbox Differentiationcited by 58
- 2019Revealing the Importance of Semantic Retrieval for Machine Reading at Scalecited by 50
- 2019Multi-step Retriever-Reader Interaction for Scalable Open-domain Question Answeringcited by 48
- 2021Decomposing Complex Questions Makes Multi-Hop QA Easier and More Interpretablecited by 35
- 2019Self-Assembling Modular Networks for Interpretable Multi-Hop Reasoningcited by 28
- 2020Complementing Lexical Retrieval with Semantic Residual Embeddingcited by 27
- 2020Active Sentence Learning by Adversarial Uncertainty Sampling in Discrete Spacecited by 17
- 2018From FiLM to Video: Multi-turn Question Answering with Multi-modal Contextcited by 12
- 2019Introducing MathQA -- A Math-Aware Question Answering Systemcited by 8
- 2016A Study of MatchPyramid Models on Ad-hoc Retrievalcited by 6
- 2017Contextualized Word Representations for Reading Comprehensioncited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
- 2024DR-RAG: Applying Dynamic Document Relevance to Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question-Answeringcited by 14
- 2026Mapping the RAG Landscape: A Four Axis Taxonomy of Efficiency, Defense, Interactivity, and Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Mapping the RAG Landscape: A Four Axis Taxonomy of Efficiency, Defense, Interactivity, and Reasoning1 Oct 2026
- 2024DR-RAG: Applying Dynamic Document Relevance to Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question-Answering11 Jun 2024
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey18 Dec 2023